CLINTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: BEAU KINSELL
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BEAU KINSELL in 645 W. JEFFERSON, CLINTON, IL 61727 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343589438.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEAU KINSELL
- Site address
- 645 W. JEFFERSON
- City
- CLINTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61727
- Mailing
- 1625 ERIN DRIVE, NORMAL, IL 61761
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On March 28, 2019, Beau Kinsell was issued citations and the employer did not certify that the citations were abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following items: a. Citation 1, Item 1b, b. Citation 1, Item 2b, c. Citation 1, item 2c, d. Citation 1, item 2d, e. Citation 1, item 2e
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,126 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about November 8, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazards while removing and installing roofing material from a two story residence and no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1900
- — C (S) $3126
- — Z (S) $3126
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about November 8, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazards while removing and installing roofing material from a two story residence and no fall protection was being used. Employees were not provided training which would have enabled them to recognize the hazards of falling and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 F02 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,126 · Current $0 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment: On or about November 8, 2018 employees engaged in roofing activities removed transite roof shingles and tar containing Chrysotile asbestos and the employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $3126
- — Z (S) $3126
1926.1101 G07 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $1,900
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(7)(i): All Class II work was not supervised by a competent person as defined in 29 CFR 1926.1101(b): On or about November 8, 2018 employees engaged in roofing activities removed transite roof shingles with tar containing Chrysotile asbestos and the Class II work was not supervised by a competent person as defined in 29 CFR 1926.1101(b).
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $1900
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 G08 II F
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(F): Upon being lowered, unwrapped material was not transferred to a closed receptacle in such a manner so as to preclude the dispersion of dust: On or about November 8, 2018 employees engaged in roofing activities removed transite roof shingles with tar containing Chrysotile asbestos and unwrapped material was not transferred to a closed receptacle in such a manner so as to preclude the dispersion of dust.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 H03 III A
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(3)(iii)(A): The employer did not provide a half-mask air-purifying respirator, other than a disposable respirator, equipped with high-efficiency filters, whenever the employee(s) performed Class II and III asbestos jobs where no negative exposure assessment was available: On or about November 8, 2018 employees engaged in roofing activities removed transite roof shingles with tar containing Chrysotile asbestos and the employer did not provide a half-mask air-purifying respirator, other than a disposable respirator, equipped with high-efficiency filters, whenever the employee(s) performed Class II and III asbestos jobs where no negative exposure assessment was available.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 K08 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(i): Labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers: On or about November 8, 2018 employees engaged in roofing activities removed transite roof shingles with tar containing Chrysotile asbestos and labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Beau Kinsell
View Beau Kinsell's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343589438.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.