ROCHESTER, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ART-CRAFT OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ART-CRAFT OPTICAL COMPANY, INC. in 57 GOODWAY DRIVE SOUTH, ROCHESTER, NY 14623 (NAICS 339115). OSHA activity number 343608303.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ART-CRAFT OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 57 GOODWAY DRIVE SOUTH
- City
- ROCHESTER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14623
- Mailing
- 57 GOODWAY DRIVE SOUTH, ROCHESTER, NY 14623
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339115
- Employees
- 32
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employee's eyes were exposed to liquid splashes when pouring methylene chloride into a bucket. Methylene chloride causes serious eye damage. Employees were not provide with appropriate chemical splash goggles. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3978
- — Z (S) $3978
1910.1052 I02
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(i)(2): It was reasonably foreseeable that an employee's eyes may contact solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater methylene chloride and the employer did not provide appropriate eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use and did not ensure that affected employees use those facilities when necessary: a) Stripping area - On or about 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employee's eyes were exposed to liquid splashes when pouring methylene chloride into a bucket. Methylene chloride causes serious eye damage. The employer did not provide appropriate eyewash facilities within the immediate work area. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible. a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employees wore North full face piece elastomeric respirator (organic vapor/P100 and CL/HC/SD/CD/HF/OV/P100 cartridges) and North half face piece elastomeric respirator (P100 cartridges). Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $5304
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employees wore North full face piece elastomeric respirator (organic vapor/P100 and CL/HC/SD/CD/HF/OV/P100 cartridges) and North half face piece elastomeric respirator (P100 cartridges). The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employees wore North full face piece elastomeric respirator (organic vapor/P100 and CL/HC/SD/CD/HF/OV/P100 cartridges) and North half face piece elastomeric respirator (P100 cartridges). Air purifying respirators are not appropriate for protection against methylene chloride vapor. The selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard to which the workers were exposed. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employees wear either a North full face piece elastomeric respirator (organic vapor/P100 and CL/HC/SD/CD/HF/OV/P100 cartridges) or a North half face piece elastomeric respirator (P100 cartridges). The employer did not provide employees with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 D01 I A
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,630 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i)(A): Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure by taking a personal breathing zone air sample of each employee's exposure. a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. The employer did not determine each employee's exposure by taking a personal breathing zone air sample of each employee's exposure. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $6630
- — Z (S) $6630
1910.1052 F03 II
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,630 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(f)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that incidental spills were cleaned promptly by employees who used the appropriate personal protective equipment and were trained in proper methods of cleanup: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. The employer did not ensure that incidental spills were cleaned up by employees who used appropriate personal equipment and were trained in proper methods of cleanup. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $6630
- — Z (S) $6630
1910.1052 L01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(l)(1): The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E02 II
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,630 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(ii): The employer's hazard communication program did not include methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operations and in foreseeable emergencies: a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, methylene chloride (99-100% w/w), to strip paint off eyeglass frames. The employer's hazard communication program did not include methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operations and in foreseeable emergencies. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $6630
- — Z (S) $6630
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employees were not provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area. Employees must be informed of: 1. The requirements of this section: 2. Any operations where hazardous chemicals are present; AND 3. The location and availability of the written Hazard Communication Program, list(s) of hazardous chemicals and Safety Data Sheets. Employee training must include at least: 1. Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area. 2. The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area. 3. The measures employees can take to protect themselves such as specific procedures, appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used. 4. The details of the employers Hazard Communication Program including an explanation of labeling systems, Safety Data Sheets and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) On or about, or prior to 11/6/18, employees use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. a) Stripping area - On or about or prior to 11/20/18, employees used methylene chloride (99-100% w/w) to strip paint off eyeglass frames. Employee's hands were exposed to liquid splashes when pouring methylene chloride into a bucket. Employees were not provided with appropriate chemical resistant gloves. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Art-Craft Optical Company, INC.
View Art-Craft Optical Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339115)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343608303.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.