Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUAN M DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN M DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ in 6590 MARSHVIEW DRIVE LOT 93, HILLIARD, OH 43026 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343643664.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Juan M Dominguez Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan M Dominguez Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6590 MARSHVIEW DRIVE LOT 93
City
HILLIARD
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
1075 E 19TH AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before December 6, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program to include a fall protection program, thereby exposing employees to a 30 foot fall hazard.  b. On or before December 6, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program to include a personal protective equipment program, thereby exposing employees to struck-by or other hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or before December 6, 2018, the employer failed to train employees on the hazards of the worksite or the regulations required to control or eliminate the worksite hazards, thereby exposing employees to fall, struck-by, or other hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,421 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or before December 6, 2018, where employees used pneumatic nail guns to secure roof sheathing, the employees' eyes were not protected from flying objects, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.  b. On or before December 6, 2018, where employees used a circular saw to cut roof sheathing, the employees' eyes were not protected from flying objects, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1421
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before December 6, 2018, where employees were sheathing the roof of a single family residential house, the employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to fall hazards of 30 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3978

View Juan M Dominguez Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343643664.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.