Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: OHIO GRATINGS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OHIO GRATINGS, INC. in 5299 SOUTHWAY ST. SW, CANTON, OH 44706 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 343682522.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ohio Gratings, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ohio Gratings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OHIO GRATINGS, INC.
Site address
5299 SOUTHWAY ST. SW
City
CANTON
State
OH
ZIP
44706
Mailing
5299 SOUTHWAY ST. SW, CANTON, OH 44706
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
385
Ownership type
Private (A)

22 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 IV D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $10,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(d): Flammable liquids were not drawn from or transferred into vessels, containers, or portable tanks within a building only through a closed piping system, from safety cans, by means of a device drawing through the top, or from a container or portable tanks by gravity through an approved self-closing valve:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an approved self-closing valve was used when transferring Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, from a plastic tote to a metal dip tank.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $10760
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.125 B01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.125(b)(1)(ii):  Properly trapped overflow piping that discharged to a safe location was not provided for any dip tank having a liquid surface area greater than 10 feet squared (0.95 m2).    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide overflow piping that discharged to a safe location for a dip tank having a surface area of approximately 139.5 square feet of Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.124 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $9,472
29 CFR 1910.124(f): Employees were not knowledgeable of the proper first-aid procedures appropriate to the dipping or coating hazards to which they were exposed:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees working with Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel in a dip tank procedure were knowledgeable of proper first-aid procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $9472
  • · C (S) $9472
  • · Z (S) $9472

1910.124 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2): Employees who worked with liquids that could burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin were not provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping and coating operation:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees who worked with liquids that could irritate their skin and eyes, including, but not limited to, Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, were provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping operation.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $9472
  • · Z (S) $9472

1910.124 J03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.124(j)(3): Periodic inspections of all dipping and coating equipment, including covers, drains, overflow piping, and electrical and fire-extinguishing systems were not conducted, and deficiencies were not promptly corrected:  On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that periodic inspections of all dipping and coating equipment, including covers, drains, overflow piping, and electrical and fire-extinguishing systems were conducted. The dip tank operation was not equipped with required safety features including but not limited to, drains, overflow piping, and missing fire-extinguishing systems.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.125 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.125(c)(1): Dip tank containing more than 500 gallons (1893 L) of liquid was not equipped with a bottom drain:  On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide a dip tank containing more than 500 gallons of Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, with a bottom drain which can be used to empty the tank during a fire.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.125 E02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $10,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.125(e)(2): Portable container(s) used to add liquid to the tank was not electrically bonded to the dip tank and was not positively grounded to prevent static electrical sparks or arcs:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the portable container used to add Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, to the dip dank was electrically bonded to the dip tank to electrostatic spark.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $10760
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.125 E04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.125(e)(4)(i): All vapor areas were not kept free of combustible debris and were not kept as free as practicable of combustible stock:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to keep the vapor area around the dip tank free of combustible debris when large pieces of cardboard covered in the Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel were kept on the floor surrounding the dip tank.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.125 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.125(f)(1): Fire protection required by 29 CFR 1910.125(f) for any dip tank having a capacity of at least 150 gallons (568 L) or a liquid surface area of at least 4 square feet (0.38 m1) was not provided:    On or about December 27, 2018, a dip tank having a surface area of approximately 139.5 square feet of Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, was not provided with fire protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $9,472 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees operating the dip tank containing Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel were using appropriate eye or face protection including, but not limited to, tightly sealed goggles.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $9472
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer did not require employees working with chemicals including, but not limited to Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, to wear chemical resistant gloves.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $9472
  • · Z (S) $9472

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,577 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that each powered industrial truck operator who utilized a forklift to add Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, to the dip tank was evaluated at least every 3 years.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $7577
  • · Z (S) $7577

1910.215 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $1,276 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not used with safety guard(s):    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that a safety guard was installed on the abrasive wheel of the surface grinder located on the back wall in the machine shop area.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1276
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $10,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet for chemicals including, but not limited to, the Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $10760
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 142 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to maintain in the workplace copies of the required data sheets for each hazardous chemical and failed to ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work areas. The books of safety data sheets were kept on-site in one area of one building and did not contain safety data sheets for all chemicals used in the facility.    a. Employees were required to ask managers for access to the SDSs not available in these books. Employees are exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to, Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a category 3 flammable liquid, when operating the dip tank.    b. Employees were required to ask managers for access to the SDSs not available in these books. Employees are exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to, Trim Sol metal working fluid when operating surface grinders and CNC machines in the machine shop department.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 142 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    a. On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide employees with effective training on the hazards associated with the chemicals in their work area including, but not limited to, Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, at their time of initial assignment when working in the dip tank operation.       b. On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide employees with effective training on the hazards associated with the chemicals in their work area including, but not limited to, Trim Sol metal working fluid, at the time of initial assignment when working in the machine shop.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $13260

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Training provided by the employer did not include the details of the employer's hazard communication program, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide employees with effective training on the details of the hazard communication program including, but not limited to, how employees can obtain a safety data sheet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.32 A03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 385 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,895 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(3): The employer did not certify an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent:  On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to certify the OSHA 300A forms which present a summary of recordable injuries and illnesses that have occurred throughout the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $1895
  • · Z (O) $1895

1910.125 E05

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.125(e)(5): A readily visible "No Smoking" sign was not posted near each dip tank:  On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to post a "No Smoking" sign near the dip tank containing a Category III flammable liquid.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 139 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7): In lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers, the employer did not ensure the written materials such as signs, placards, process sheets, batch tickets, or operating procedures, containing the information required by paragraph (f)(6) of this section to be on a label, were readily accessible to the employees in their work area throughout each work shift:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the dip tank containing Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel, a Category 3 flammable liquid, was labeled or that written materials contained the information required by paragraph f(6) of this section.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to certify in writing that an assessment of the workplace to determine if hazards are present which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    On or about December 27, 2018, the employer failed to provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators on a voluntary basis while operating the dip tank containing Water Reducible Alkyd Dip Enamel.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Ohio Gratings, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343682522.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.