SAINT JAMES, MO —
OSHA Inspection: PROCK OPERATIONS, INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PROCK OPERATIONS, INC in 321 EAST HARDY STREET, SAINT JAMES, MO 65559 (NAICS 722330). OSHA activity number 343745949.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROCK OPERATIONS, INC
- Site address
- 321 EAST HARDY STREET
- City
- SAINT JAMES
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65559
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 1892, ROLLA, MO 65402
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722330
- Employees
- 85
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 G01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Abate by
- May 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,834 · Current $4,084 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(1): Spraying was conducted outside of predetermined spraying areas: At the time of the inspection, employees were spraying flammable EverStrong ES30 contact adhesive outside of paint booths.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4083.8
- — Z (S) $5834
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Abate by
- May 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,834 · Current $4,084 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: At the time of the inspection, the electrical panel near the Magnasand spray booth had an opening exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4083.8
- — Z (S) $5834
1910.1052 D01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,834 · Current $4,084 Reduced
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i): Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure: At the time of the inspection, when employees were spraying contact adhesive with 40-50% methylene chloride in the workplace the employer had not conducted exposure monitoring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4083.8
- — Z (S) $5834
1910.1052 K01 III
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Abate by
- May 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,834 · Current $4,084 Reduced
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii): The employer did not include methylene chloride in the hazard communication program established to comply with hazard communication standard (HCS) (1910.1200) and did not ensure each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section: At the time of the inspection, the employer had not included methylene chloride in the hazard communication program. Employees exposed to methylene chloride were not trained on the requirements of 1910.1052 and its appendices. When exposures were found to be above the action level the employees had not been trained as required by 1910.1052(l)(3)(ii).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4083.8
- — Z (S) $5834
1910.1052 J01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Abate by
- May 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,834 · Current $4,084 Reduced
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who were or potentially were exposed to methylene chloride at or above the action level on 30 or more days per year, or above the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or the short term exposure limit on 10 or more days per year: At the time of the inspection, the employer had not made medical surveillance available to employees. The exposure monitoring found two instances where employees were exposed to methylene chloride above the action level of 12.5ppm.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4083.8
- — Z (S) $5834
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2019
- Abate by
- May 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: At the time of the inspection, painters spraying MAGNALAC lacquer were required to wear 1/2 mask respirators and no written respirator program was implemented.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Prock Operations, INC
View Prock Operations, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722330)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343745949.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.