DUNCANSVILLE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: GLASS BAGGING ENTERPRISES, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of GLASS BAGGING ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1212 MILL ROAD, DUNCANSVILLE, PA 16635 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 343787065.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GLASS BAGGING ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- 1212 MILL ROAD
- City
- DUNCANSVILLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16635
- Mailing
- 1212 MILL ROAD, DUNCANSVILLE, PA 16635
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423320
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,600 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to institute a continuing effective hearing conservation program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA. An employee standing bags of White Sand on the Bagging Line was exposed to noise at a level of 68.1% of the allowable limit during a 235 minute sampling period on February 27, 2019. This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 87.2 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure. The exposure is 1.4 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $2842
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to develop and implement a monitoring program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to establish and maintain an audiometric testing program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- May 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to implement the medical evaluation element of their written program necessary to ensure that employees working on the bag line wearing a half mask air purifying respirator were medically able to do so.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1705
1910.134 E06 I
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- May 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator: a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line. b) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line. c) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line. d) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Glass Bagging Enterprises, INC.
View Glass Bagging Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423320)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343787065.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.