Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GLASS BAGGING ENTERPRISES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of GLASS BAGGING ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1212 MILL ROAD, DUNCANSVILLE, PA 16635 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 343787065.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Glass Bagging Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Glass Bagging Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1212 MILL ROAD
City
DUNCANSVILLE
State
PA
ZIP
16635
Mailing
1212 MILL ROAD, DUNCANSVILLE, PA 16635
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,600 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to institute a continuing effective hearing conservation program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA. An employee standing bags of White Sand on the Bagging Line was exposed to noise at a level of 68.1% of the allowable limit during a 235 minute sampling period on February 27, 2019. This exposure is equivalent to a sound level of 87.2 dBA for the dose and time of employee exposure. The exposure is 1.4 times in excess of the 85 dBA action level (50%) at which the hearing conservation program is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2842

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to develop and implement a monitoring program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to establish and maintain an audiometric testing program when employee noise exposures exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to implement the medical evaluation element of their written program necessary to ensure that employees working on the bag line wearing a half mask air purifying respirator were medically able to do so.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1705

1910.134 E06 I

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP)  a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator:  a) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line.  b) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line.  c) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line.  d) On the Bagging Line, on or about February 27, 2019 - The employer failed to obtain from a physician or other licensed health car professional (PHLCP) a written recommendation regarding an employee's ability to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while working on the bag line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Glass Bagging Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343787065.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.