ORLANDO, FL —
OSHA Inspection: OAK RIDGE GUN RANGE INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OAK RIDGE GUN RANGE INC. in 6160 S ORANGE AVENUE, ORLANDO, FL 32809 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 343818514.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OAK RIDGE GUN RANGE INC.
- Site address
- 6160 S ORANGE AVENUE
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32809
- Mailing
- 6160 S ORANGE AVENUE, ORLANDO, FL 32809
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 713990
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1025 F02 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator: a) Range - during shooting range duties, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program or completed the elements that were required to be included, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2652
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Range - During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Range - Employees required to wear a respirator during range cleaning did not have fit-testing prior to the use of a respirator, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 F03 I C
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(3)(i)(C): The employer did not provide HEPA filters for powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators: a) Range - During shooting range cleaning, employees wore Uline N95 dust masks and Gerson half-face air purifying respirators with organic vapor cartridges, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) Lobby and range - An employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 1.78 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 445 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 35 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2652
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.1025 E04 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i): When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements which demonstrate the effectiveness of the system in controlling exposures were not made at least every three months: a) Range- Ventilation was provided in the range to control lead levels and no measurements were being taken to determine the effectiveness of the ventilation, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2652
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,895 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the microwave handle, 4.81 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. b) On the refrigerator handle, 3.965 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. c) On the microwave number pad, 4.775 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. d) On the computer mouse for the corner computer behind the counter, 2.2225 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. e) On the back door panic bar, 231.8 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1894.5
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.1025 I02 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: a) Range - No change rooms were provided for an employee exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2652
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.1025 I03 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: a) Range - No shower were provided for an employee exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 J01 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 89.21 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with any type of medical surveillance, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2652
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.1025 J02 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i): The employer did not make available biological monitoring, including blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels for each employee covered under 29 CFR 1910.1025 (j)(1)(i): a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 89.21 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with zinc protoporphyrin monitoring, on or about February 28, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at OAK Ridge GUN Range INC.
View OAK Ridge GUN Range INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 713990)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343818514.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.