Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: RED HEAD BRASS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RED HEAD BRASS LLC in 643 LEGION DRIVE, SHREVE, OH 44676 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 343827614.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RED Head Brass LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RED Head Brass LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RED HEAD BRASS LLC
Site address
643 LEGION DRIVE
City
SHREVE
State
OH
ZIP
44676
Mailing
643 LEGION DRIVE, SHREVE, OH 44676
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
Employees
65
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.124 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.124(e):  When employees enter dip tanks, the employer must meet the entry requirements of 1910.146 to include the employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:    On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not inform employees, by posting danger signs or other equally effective means, that work near and enter the plating process RH tank of the existence, location, and danger posed by the permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $6630

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Aug 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $4,641 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.     a) On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were developed when maintenance workers perform service and maintenance operations on the CNC lathes throughout the shop.    b) On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not ensure energy control procedures were developed when maintenance workers perform service and maintenance operations on the Acme-Gridley screw machines throughout the shop.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4641
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $4,641 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    a) On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not ensure machine operators required to perform service and maintenance activities, including but not limited too, die changes and clearing jams of the CNC lathes, were trained in the purpose and function of the energy control program.    b) On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not ensure machine operators required to perform service and maintenance activities, including but not limited too, die changes and clearing jams of the Acme-Gridley screw machines, were trained in the purpose and function of the energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4641
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,956 · Current $3,978 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspections of the cranes were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(a) of this section or as specifically indicated:    On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not conduct frequent (daily to monthly) inspections of the overhead cranes to include but not limited to the Budgit 1 ton located at the plating department.  The cranes are used on a daily basis to put pieces into and out of the plating tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3978
  • · Z (S) $7956

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  On or about March 5, 2019, the employer did not conduct periodic (annual) inspections of the overhead cranes to include but not limited to the Budgit 1 ton located at the plating department. The cranes are used on a daily basis to put pieces into and out of the plating tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $4,641 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about March 5, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that machinery including, but not limited to the following, had machine guarding methods in place:    a) The Okuma LC20-2ST #1, S/N 6106-3503, did not have working interlocks.  b) The Okuma LC20-2ST #2, S/N 6212-3800, did not have working interlocks.  c) The Okuma LC20-2ST #3, S/N 6301-3740, did not have working interlocks.  d) The Okuma LC30-2SC #1, S/N 6108-1444, did not have working interlocks.  e) Morei Seiki SL-15 small lathe MFG#74  f) Threadmill machines 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, and 121 were not equipped with guards around the hobs to prevent accidental contact.  g) The tool room Yamazaki Machinery Works Ltd. lathe was not equipped with an adequate chuck guard to prevent flying chips and sparks. Part of the guard was replaced with a piece of cardboard.  h) The Acme-Gridley Screw Machines, to include but not limited too, #17 did not have working interlocks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4641
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,956 · Current $3,978 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    On and about March 5, 2019, multi CNC lathe employees were exposed to the following abrasive wheel bench grinders that had work rests that were not adjusted to 1/8 of an inch next to the abrasive wheels, to include but not limited too:    a) The Dewalt DW758 abrasive wheel bench grinder, located by Okuma LC-20-2ST #3, was missing the work rest and had openings of approximately 2 inches.    b) The Baldor abrasive wheel bench grinder was missing the work rest and had openings of approximately 2 inches.    c) The bench grinder (No information on grinder) located by the Haas CNC machine was missing the work rest and had openings of approximately 2 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3978
  • · Z (S) $7956

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  On and about March 5, 2019, multi CNC lathe employees were exposed to the following abrasive wheel bench grinders that had periphery guarding that was not adjusted to 1/4 of an inch next to the abrasive wheels, to include but not limited too:  a) The Dewalt DW758 abrasive wheel bench grinder, located by Okuma LC-20-2ST #3, was missing the periphery guarding.  b) The Baldor abrasive wheel bench grinder was missing the periphery guarding.  c) The bench grinder (No information on grinder) located by the Haas CNC machine was missing the periphery guarding.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i., to include but not limited too:    a) On and before March 5, 2019 the Okuma LC-20-2ST CNC lathe machine#1 had compressed air used for cleaning that was approximately 40 psi.    b) On and before March 5, 2019 the Mori Seiki SL-15 CNC lathe machine MFG #74 had compressed air used for cleaning that was approximately 58 psi.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1989
  • · Z (S) $3978

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $3,315 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    On or about March 5, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees exposed to electrical shock hazards were properly trained in the safe work practices required by this section to included use of personal protection equipment, skills and techniques necessary to distinguish exposed live parts, skills and techniques necessary to determine nominal voltage of exposed live parts, and clearance distances specified and corresponding voltages.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3315
  • · Z (S) $6630

1910.303 E01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii): Electric equipment shall not be used unless markings have been placed on equipment such as voltage, current, wattage and other ratings as necessary:  On or about March 5, 2019, the electrical boxes located in the electroplating area, did not have the voltage marked on the boxes thereby exposing employees to a burn hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View RED Head Brass LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343827614.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.