Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLAMBEAU, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FLAMBEAU, INC. in 1468 WOLF CREEK TRAIL, SHARON CENTER, OH 44274 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 344080536.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flambeau, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flambeau, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLAMBEAU, INC.
Site address
1468 WOLF CREEK TRAIL
City
SHARON CENTER
State
OH
ZIP
44274
Mailing
1468 WOLF CREEK TRAIL, SHARON CENTER, OH 44274
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
2500
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Oct 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,503 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes:    On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that employees who work with various knives and cutters as part of their job working on the blow mold presses were wearing puncture resistant gloves and/or arm protection or long sleeves to protect them from punctures, lacerations and severe cuts.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $8000
  • — C (S) $12503
  • — Z (S) $12503

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Oct 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $13,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    a. On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that operators who were tasked with unjamming equipment and removing stuck parts were trained as authorized employees to perform such tasks.     b. On or about September 4, 2019 a maintenance employee was working on Press #2 due to an electrical issue and had not applied appropriate locks to all energy sources, including the hydraulics.  The employee was identified as an authorized employee but had not received appropriate training by the company.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $13000
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Oct 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d):The application of energy control (lockout or tagout) actions were not done in the following sequence:    (1) prepare for shutdown,  (2) shut down machine or equipment,  (3) physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,  (4) affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device by authorized employee,  (5) relieve, disconnect, restrain or otherwise render safe all stored or residual energy,  (6) verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished:    a.) On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that Press #13 (Sterling, 16D13, serial #66076) was locked and tagged out prior to an employee entering through the gated double door in order to access the inside of the mold to retrieve a part that was stuck.  Steps 1-6 were not applied prior to the employee performing this task.      b.) On or about September 4, 2019, the employer failed to ensure the Press #2 was locked and tagged out properly prior to an employees performing electrical work on the equipment. Steps 1-6 were not applied prior to the employee performing this task.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Nov 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):      On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that a maintenance employee at the facility who was operating various powered industrial vehicles was trained and authorized to operate the vehicles.  The employee who was not trained operated the Mitsubishi, FGC25, serial #AF8F31682.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6000
  • — C (S) $10419
  • — Z (S) $10419

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Oct 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $10,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place on Press Machines, including but not limited to, the Sterling Press Mold #13.  Press #13 did not have a safety mat in place, had an electrically faulty front door safety strip and no other forms of adequate guarding in place including the back side of the press to protect employees from struck-by hazards created by moving machinery during normal operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10000
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 C04 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Oct 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $72,930 · Current $88,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a.) On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were utilizing lockout/tagout procedures when entering the gated double doors in order to access the inside of the mold to retrieve jammed parts in Press #13 (Sterling, 16D13, serial #66076).    b.) On or about September 4, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were utilizing lock/tagout procedures when performing maintenance on Press #2. Employees failed to lock out the hydraulics on the press. Employees had only applied a lock to the main disconnect.     NOTE:  The employer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or it's equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection #1084333, citation 1, item 2a, which was affirmed as final order on September 25, 2015, with respect to the workplace located at 1330 Atlanta Highway, Madison GA 30650.    NOTE:  The employer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or it's equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection #1142297 citation 1, item 2, which was affirmed as final order on August 19, 2016, with respect to the workplace located at 1330 Atlanta Highway, Madison GA 30650.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $88000
  • — C (R) $72930
  • — Z (R) $72930

1910.147 C06 I B

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2019
Abate by
Nov 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $72,930 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(B): The periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was not conducted to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified:    On or about April 29, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that a periodic inspection of their written lock out tag out control of hazardous energy procedures was conducted to ensure that is was up to date and effective.      NOTE:  The employer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or it's equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection #1084333, citation 1, item 3 which was affirmed as final order on September 25, 2015, with respect to the workplace located at 1330 Atlanta Highway, Madison GA 30650.-
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $0
  • — C (R) $72930
  • — Z (R) $72930

View Flambeau, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344080536.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.