CHITTENANGO, NY —
OSHA Inspection: CPP SYRACUSE INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CPP SYRACUSE INC. in 901 EAST GENESEE STREET, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037 (NAICS 331512). OSHA activity number 344087473.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch CPP Syracuse INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CPP Syracuse INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CPP SYRACUSE INC.
- Site address
- 901 EAST GENESEE STREET
- City
- CHITTENANGO
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13037
- Mailing
- 901 EAST GENESEE STREET, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331512
- Employees
- 229
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G08 II B
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $11,366 · Current $8,525 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(B): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, that for employees already using hearing protectors, employees be refitted and retrained in the use of hearing protectors and provided with hearing protectors offering greater attenuation if necessary: a) Finishing area, on or about 6/26/19: A finisher was overexposed to noise above 90 decibels (dBA) at a dose of 251% for an 8 hour time weighted average (8-hr. TWA) of 96.63 dBA during the 330 minute sampling period. A zero increment was included for the 150 minutes not sampled. The employee was not refitted and retrained on hearing protection after exhibiting a standard threshold shift (STS) on the 2019 audiogram. b) CCG area, on or about 6/26/19: Representative sampling showed that a CCG operator was overexposed to noise above 90 dBA at a dose of 135.6% for an 8-hr. TWA of 92.2 dBA during the 339 minute sampling period. A zero increment was included for the 141 minutes not sampled. The employee was not refitted and retrained on hearing protection after exhibiting a standard threshold shift (STS) on the 2019 audiogram. c) Finishing area, on or about 6/26/19: A finisher was exposed to noise above 85 dBA at a dose of 98.3% for an 8-hr. TWA of 89.8 dBA during the 363 minute sampling period. A zero increment was included for the 117 minutes not sampled. The employee was not refitted and retrained on hearing protection after exhibiting a standard threshold shift (STS) on the 2019 audiogram. d) Finishing area, on or about 6/26/19: Representative sampling showed that a finisher was exposed to noise above 85 dBA at a dose of 87.9% for an 8-hr. TWA of 89.1 dBA during the 362 minute sampling period. A zero increment was included for the 118 minutes not sampled. The employee was not refitted and retrained on hearing protection after exhibiting a standard threshold shift (STS) on the 2019 audiogram.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $8524.5
- — C (S) $11366
- — Z (S) $11366
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $7,577 · Current $5,683 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Class I flammable liquid(s) were dispensed into containers without electrically interconnecting the nozzle and the container: a) FPI area, on or about 6/17/19: Employees transferring acetone from a 55 gallon drum into 5 gallon containers did not electrically interconnect both containers.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5682.75
- — C (S) $7577
- — Z (S) $7577
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: a) FPI area, on or about 6/17/19: Training on work practices such as bonding of containers were not provided for employees transferring acetone from a 55 gallon drum into 5 gallon containers.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.124 F
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,683 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(f): Employees were not knowledgeable of the proper first-aid procedures appropriate to the dipping or coating hazards to which they were exposed: a) Acid etch area, on or about 6/26/19: Training on first aid procedures was not provided for employees working near dip tanks while mixing ferric chloride, hydrochloric, and nitric acids.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $5683
- — Z (S) $5683
1910.124 H03
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(h)(3): Employees working with liquids that could burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin were not provided with appropriate first-aid supplies that were located near dipping or coating operations: a) Acid etch area, on or about 6/26/19: First aid supplies were not provided for employees working near dip tanks containing ferric chloride, hydrochloric, and nitric acids.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: a) Acid etch area, on or about 6/26/19:Training on PPE such as use of face shields was not provided for employees mixing hydrochloric acid, ferric chloride and nitric acid.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $7,577 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) Acid etch area, on or about 6/26/19: Employees mixing hydrochloric acid, ferric chloride and nitric acid did not wear a face shields.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7577
- — Z (S) $7577
1910.1096 E02
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,683 · Current $0 Reduced
8290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(2): The radiation area(s) were not conspicuously posted with a sign or signs bearing the radiation caution symbol described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1) and the words: "Caution, Radiation Area": a) Linacs 2, 4 Mev and 450 Kv X-Ray systems, on or about 10/17/19: Signs warning of exposure to radiation were not posted near three peep holes to the right of the operator's station. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $5683
- — Z (S) $5683
1910.1096 E03 II
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(3)(ii): High radiation area(s) were not equipped with a control device that either caused the level of radiation to be reduced below that at which an individual might receive a dose of 100 millirems in one hour upon entry into the area or shall energize a conspicuous visible or audible alarm signal in such a manner that the individual entering and the employer or a supervisor of the activity were made aware of the entry: a) Linacs 2, X-Ray 4 Mev system, on or about 10/17/19: Neither an audible nor visible alarm for the 4 Mev system was located so that employees working at the sides and the rear of the containment including, but not limited to, supervisors and non-entry employees were aware of an entry. Visible alarm could not be seen from the sides or the back of the containment opening. The audible alarm was 84 dBA at the door and below 67 dBA at the sides and the rear of the containment. b) Linacs 2, 450 Kv X-Ray system, on or about 10/17/19: Neither an audible nor visible alarm for the 450 Kv system was located so that employees working at the sides and the rear of the containment including, but not limited to, supervisors and non-entry employees were aware of an entry. Visible alarm could not be seen from the sides or the back of the containment opening. The audible alarm was imperceptible at the door and at the sides and the rear of the containment. Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331512)
Jun 18, 2026
317744514 - PCC Structurals INC · MILWAUKIE, OR
Jun 16, 2026
Acra Cast INC · BAY CITY, MI
May 29, 2026
Metaltek International, INC. · WATERTOWN, WI
May 14, 2026
Precision Castings of Tennessee, INC. · GALLATIN, TN
Jan 15, 2026
Wolf Technologies, LLC · DOUGLASSVILLE, PA
More inspections in NY
Jul 17, 2026
Sullivan County Care Center at Sunset Lake · LIBERTY, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Vergara Electrical LLC · NEW YORK, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Apple Converting, INC. · ONEONTA, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Namicela Home Solutions INC · SYRACUSE, NY
Jul 17, 2026
Cranesville Block CO., INC. · SYRACUSE, NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344087473.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.