CAMPO, CA —
OSHA Inspection: KOO CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of KOO CONSTRUCTION in 2408 28TH STREET CQC BLDG AT CAMP M. MONSOOR, CAMPO, CA 91906 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 344150511.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KOO CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 2408 28TH STREET CQC BLDG AT CAMP M. MONSOOR
- City
- CAMPO
- State
- CA
- ZIP
- 91906
- Mailing
- 2408 28TH STREET, SACRAMENTO, CA 95818
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,046 · Current $1,432 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103). Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: interior CQC building: An employee was required to use a 3M full face negative pressure respirator and a 3M N95 filtering face piece respirator while conducting spray painting operations on the interior building walls and ceiling. The employee was not medically evaluated to determine if the respirator by itself could create a hazard for the employee. The employee is exposed to respiratory irritation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1432.2
- — Z (S) $2046
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103) Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: interior CQC building: An employee was wearing a 3M full face negative pressure respirator and a 3M N95 filtering face piece while painting walls and ceilings. The employer had not provided fit testing prior to using the respirators. The employee was exposed to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: (Construction Reference 1926.103). Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: interior CQC building: An employee was using a 3M full face negative pressure respirator and a 3M N95 filtering face piece while painting walls and ceilings. The 3M filtering face piece was stored on top of spray equipment. The employer had not provided guidance on storing procedures specific to the two respirators. The employee was exposed to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01 I
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: interior CQC building: An employee was using a 3M full face negative pressure respirator and a 3M N95 filtering face piece while painting walls and ceilings. The 3M filtering face piece was stored on top of spray equipment. The employer had not ensured that the employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was required, fit parameters, and maintenance procedures for the respirators. The employee was exposed to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,046 · Current $1,432 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: CQC building: An employee conducting spray painting operations was not provided training products such as Pro-Cryl Universal Acrylic Primer and Pro-Industrial Waterborne Acrylic Dryfall by the employer at the time of his initial assignment. The employee was exposed to inhalation and dermal hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1432.2
- — Z (S) $2046
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) Naval Base Coronado: Camp Michael Monsoor: CQC building: An employee conducting spray painting operations was not provided safety data sheet (SDS) for Pro-Cryl Universal Acrylic Primer and Pro-Industrial Waterborne Acrylic Dryfall - flat at the initial start of the assignment or thereafter. The employer did not maintain the SDS onsite or provide safety data sheet information to employee. The employee was exposed to inhalation and dermal hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at KOO Construction
View KOO Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in CA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344150511.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.