SAIPAN, MP —
OSHA Inspection: AFETNA CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AFETNA CORPORATION in CORNER OF BEACH RD AND AFETNA RD. SAN ANTONIO, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 344157714.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AFETNA CORPORATION
- Site address
- CORNER OF BEACH RD AND AFETNA RD. SAN ANTONIO
- City
- SAIPAN
- State
- MP
- ZIP
- 96950
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 502651, SAIPAN, MP 96950
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,932 · Current $1,932
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. Second Floor: Worker painting the ceiling was not wearing eye protection exposing worker to potential eye and facial injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1932
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,737 · Current $2,737
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Second Floor: A worker working at the edge of the upper surface was not protected from falling to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2737
1926.502 D
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system: Second Floor: A worker working at the edge of the upper surface was using a body belt without the lanyard secured and was not protected from falling to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in MP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344157714.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.