Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JCH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of JCH CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in FENWOOD DRIVE, NEW LONDON, NH 03257 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344235924.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JCH Construction Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JCH Construction Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FENWOOD DRIVE
City
NEW LONDON
State
NH
ZIP
03257
Mailing
831 LAKEVIEW AVENUE, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.  b.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   Location: Roof  On or about 8/15/19, the employer did not ensure employees working on a three story roof had their personal fall arrest system rigged to limit free fall to less than 6 feet. The employees had the life line attached directly to the back D ring on the harness without a rope grab which would have allowed them to fall more than 6 feet before system engaged to arrest the fall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2019
Abate by
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:  Location: roof On or about 8/15/19 the employer did not ensure fall arrest systems used by employees on a three story roof were inspected and damaged components were removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2019
Abate by
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the correct use and operation of personal fall arrest equipment.  Location: Roof Instance 1: On or about 8/15/19, employees working on a roof more than 6 feet above a lower level were not trained in the correct use of the personal fall arrest system they were using. The employees had the life line attached directly to the back D ring on the harness without a rope grab which would have allowed them to fall more than 6 feet before system engaged to arrest the fall.  Instance 2: On or about 8/15/19 an employee working on a roof more than 6 feet above a lower level were not trained in the correct use of the personal fall arrest system they were using. The employee was utilizing a personal fall arrest system had excessive slack in the body harness.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

View JCH Construction Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344235924.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.