Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JORGE SANCHEZ GOMEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JORGE SANCHEZ GOMEZ in LOT 409 6950 SCARLET OAK DRIVE, HILLIARD, OH 43026 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344237185.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jorge Sanchez Gomez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jorge Sanchez Gomez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JORGE SANCHEZ GOMEZ
Site address
LOT 409 6950 SCARLET OAK DRIVE
City
HILLIARD
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
2489 GOLDENGATE SQUARE N, APT. 1, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 26, 2019
Abate by
Oct 16, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program such as but not limited to a fall protection program, thereby exposing employees to 12 foot 7 inch fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 26, 2019
Abate by
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to train employees on the hazards of the worksite or the regulations required to control or eliminate the hazards, thereby exposing employees to 12 foot, 7 inch fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 26, 2019
Abate by
Oct 16, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.   a. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to train employees on the hazards of falling or the procedures required to minimize the fall hazards, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards of 12 feet, 7 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 26, 2019
Abate by
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees were framing the second story of a new construction house, the window openings were not guarded, thereby exposing employees to a 12 foot, 7 inch fall hazard.  b. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees were framing the second story of a new construction house, the interior of the second story was not guarded, thereby exposing employees to a 10 foot fall hazard.  c. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees were framing a new construction house, the basement opening was not guarded, thereby exposing employees to a 9 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

View Jorge Sanchez Gomez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344237185.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.