Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL BAUTISTA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL BAUTISTA in LOT 408 6958 SCARLET OAK DRIVE, HILLIARD, OH 43026 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344237284.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Bautista — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Bautista is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL BAUTISTA
Site address
LOT 408 6958 SCARLET OAK DRIVE
City
HILLIARD
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
978 LOCKBORNE ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43206
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2019
Abate by
Oct 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,421 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program such as a electrical safety program, thereby exposing employees to a 125 volt electrical contact hazard.  b. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program such as a fall protection program, thereby exposing employees to a 13 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1421
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2019
Abate by
Oct 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,421 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, the employer failed to train employees on the hazards of the worksite or the regulations required to control or eliminate the hazards, thereby exposing the employees to 125 volt electrical contact and 13 foot fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1421
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2019
Abate by
Oct 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,137 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees used an extension cord to provide electrical power to circular saws, the ground prong was missing from the male end of the cord, thereby exposing employees to a 125 volt electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1136.5
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2019
Abate by
Oct 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees were framing the second story of a new construction house, the window openings were not guarded, thereby exposing employees to a 13 foot fall hazard.  b. On or before August 15, 2019, where employees were framing a new construction house, the basement opening was not guarded, thereby exposing employees to a 9 foot 2 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3978

View Miguel Bautista's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344237284.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.