ELK MOUND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ELK MOUND SEED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ELK MOUND SEED in 308 RAILROAD STREET, ELK MOUND, WI 54739 (NAICS 311224). OSHA activity number 344250352.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELK MOUND SEED
- Site address
- 308 RAILROAD STREET
- City
- ELK MOUND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54739
- Mailing
- 308 RAILROAD STREET, ELK MOUND, WI 54739
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311224
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,385 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which could possibly affect capacity and safe operation were performed by the customer without manufacturers prior written approval: (a) Toyota forklift; The employer did not obtain written manufacturer approval for the use of the front end attachment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2385
- — Z (S) $3978
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The user did not request, for trucks equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: (a) Toyota forklift; The forklift was not marked to identify the combined weight of the truck and the front end attachment at maximum elevation, with its load centered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,385 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: (a) Throughout the facility; Employee(s) were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2385
- — Z (S) $3978
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,705 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, and shall not be placed in service if the examination shows any condition adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examination shall be made at least daily: (a) Production; The Toyota forklift was not examined on a daily basis before being placed in service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1705
- — Z (S) $2842
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311224)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344250352.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.