Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES LLC in 150 ROYAL OAK DRIVE, BRANSON, MO 65616 (NAICS 325194). OSHA activity number 344296314.

Watch Royal OAK Enterprises LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Royal OAK Enterprises LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
150 ROYAL OAK DRIVE
City
BRANSON
State
MO
ZIP
65616
Mailing
150 ROYAL OAK DRIVE, BRANSON, MO 65616
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325194
Employees
55
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 6 instances 55 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1082.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  The employer failed to provided to OSHA a certificate of abatement for the citations issued on February 20, 2020 for the facility located at 150 Royal Oak Dr. Branson, MO. The certifications were due to OSHA by March 17, 2020 and were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1082

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13494.00 · Current $12689.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9210E200M110

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces were not kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition:    The employer is failing to ensure that surfaces inside the truck dump and dust collector area is being kept clean of charcoal dust which could create potential fire hazards. This was most recently documented on November 5, 2019, at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO, when charcoal dust had accumulated on elevated surfaces throughout the enclosed building. Dust had accumulated on the surfaces of walls, wall ledges, on top of observable elevated beams and ductwork, and on top of equipment and other fixtures in the work area. Employees are being exposed to possible severe burns from the potential fire hazards from the accumulation of flammable dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12689
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.22 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9210E200M110

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of each workroom was not maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition:  The employer is failing to ensure that floors inside the truck dump and dust collector area is being kept clean of charcoal dust which could create potential fire hazards. This was most recently documented on November 5, 2019, at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO, when charcoal dust had accumulated on the floor throughout the enclosed building. Dust had accumulated on the floor of the in the work area. Employees are being exposed to possible severe burns from the potential fire hazards from the accumulation of dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10603.00 · Current $9967.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:    At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employees from occupational noise hazards. This was most recently demonstrated on or about September 9, 2019 when:    1) An employee in the bag area/performing bagging work was exposed to a dose of 176.8% or an equivalent of 94.1 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program.    2) An employee in the bag room area/performing bagging work was exposed to a dose of 113.3% or an equivalent of 90.9 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program.    3) An employee in the burn room area/performing burner work was exposed to a dose of 107.3% or an equivalent of 90.5 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program.    4) An employee in the press room area/performing press operator work was exposed to a dose of 95.4% or an equivalent of 89.6 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $9967
  • — Z (S) $10603

1910.95 G05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10603.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared:  At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Rd., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards of occupational noise exposure. Employees are exposed to noise levels in the facility that are at or above 85 decibels and were not provided with a baseline audiogram to compare future tests with. This was most recently demonstrated on or about October 9, 2019, when an employee in bagging area, performing bagging and cleaning work was exposed decibels above the action level of 85 decibels and had not received baseline audiogram testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10603

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10603.00 · Current $9967.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Rd., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employee from severe burns and smoke inhalation hazards. Employees are exposed to fire hazards at the facility. Portable fire extinguishers are provided to employees to use in the event of an incipient stage fire. Extinguishers in the Pit were not mounted, located and identified to employees in the event they needed to access them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9967
  • — Z (S) $10603

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10603.00 · Current $9967.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:    The employer is failing to ensure employees are protected from fall hazards while working from an attached platform. This was most recently documented on November 5, 2019, at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO, when an employee was working on a platform attached to a forklift, which did not have approval from the manufacturer prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9967
  • — Z (S) $10603

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  The employer is failing to ensure that employees are protected from fall hazards while working from an attached platform. This was most recently documented on November 5, 2019, at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO, when an employee was working on a platform attached to a forklift, which had not been marked adequately for its purpose, weight, elevation and use of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.254 D09 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10603.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced:  At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employee from electrical shock hazards. Employees are exposed electrical shock by use of a Lincoln Electric AC/DC Arc Welder. This was most recently demonstrated on September 10, 2019 when the arc welder was used to fabricate metal guards for a series of hoppers known as the rocket launcher. There was damage to the cables and those parts had not been replaced prior to the use of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10603

1910.95 K03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1190.00 · Current $1103.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use and care:    At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employees from occupational noise hazards. This was most recently demonstrated on or about September 10, 2019 when the employer was aware of occupational noises at the workplace, but had not ensured that all employees participated in the training program that included the attenuation of various types, fitting, use and care of hearing protection. Employees in the production areas were exposed to noise levels above 85 decibels, but were not fully informed of how to protect themselves from occupational noise.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1103
  • — Z (O) $1190

View ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344296314.