CHICOPEE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: HECTOR LOPEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HECTOR LOPEZ in 39 FAIRVIEW AVE., CHICOPEE, MA 01013 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344348016.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HECTOR LOPEZ
- Site address
- 39 FAIRVIEW AVE.
- City
- CHICOPEE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01013
- Mailing
- 92 EUCLID AVE, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that each cited violation has been abated: As of January 28, 2020 the Employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations from Inspection 1434801, issued on 10/28/2019 with a final order date of 11/27/2019
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $325
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Site: On the portico at 39 Fairview Avenue, Chicopee, MA 01013: On 10/1/2019 employees engaged in installing siding were working at a height greater than 6 feet and were exposed to edges which were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor were the employees provided with alternative fall protection measures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Site: On the portico at 39 Fairview Avenue, Chicopee, MA 01013: On 10/1/2019 employees installed siding at a height greater than 6 feet from the ground and were exposed to fall hazards from unguarded edges and did not have fall protection training to recognize the hazards of falling nor the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. (a) Site: On the portico at 39 Fairview Avenue, Chicopee, MA 01013: On 10/1/2019 employees installed siding at a height greater than 6 feet from the ground and were exposed to fall hazards from unguarded edges and the employer had not certified them in fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Site: On the portico at 39 Fairview Avenue, Chicopee, MA 01013: On 10/1/2019 a portable ladder used to access the top of the portico was not positioned so that the ladder side rails extended 3 feet above the access point on the portico, requiring employees to steps laterally from the ladder to access the portico's landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3978
More inspections at Hector Lopez
View Hector Lopez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344348016.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.