BOSTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC in 68A CEDAR STREET FORT HILL APARTMENTS, BOSTON, MA 02119 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344416961.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 68A CEDAR STREET FORT HILL APARTMENTS
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02119
- Mailing
- MANUAL P. YUNGA C/O CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC. 25 LAUREL AVE, IRVINGTON, NJ 07111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 D
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system: Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section. Location: Jobsite On or about November 5, 2019, an employee was exposed to injuries associated with falling while wearing a body belt as component of a personal fall arrest system such as slipping out of the body belt while unconscious, internal injuries from sudden stop forces on the torso and/or asphyxiation from prolonged suspension.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4268
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,376 · Current $4,376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. Location: Jobsite On or about October 28th 2019 and employee was injured from a fall while working on a roof while connected to a anchor bracket that was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person and became detached from the structure when the employee fell from the roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4376
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,376 · Current $4,376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level. Location: Jobsite On or about October 28 2019, an employee was injured from a fall of 16 feet to the ground below while working where the fall arrest system was not capable of preventing contact with the next lower level or limiting the free fall to not more than six feet. Actual accident. October 28, 2019, Employee fell 16 feet and made contact with ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4376
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Location: Jobsite On or about November 5, 2019 employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to and over 16 feet from a rooftop to the ground below, where untrained employees were unable to recognize or avoid fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. Location: Jobsite On or about November 5 2019 employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to 16 feet to the ground below while using an aluminum step ladder that was not extended at least three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4268
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Location: Jobsite On or about November 5, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards associated with the use of portable ladders while working where ladder training had not been provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at CAG Construction LLC
View CAG Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344416961.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.