Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC in 68A CEDAR STREET FORT HILL APARTMENTS, BOSTON, MA 02119 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344416961.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CAG Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CAG Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
68A CEDAR STREET FORT HILL APARTMENTS
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02119
Mailing
MANUAL P. YUNGA C/O CAG CONSTRUCTION LLC. 25 LAUREL AVE, IRVINGTON, NJ 07111
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system: Note:  The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.   Location: Jobsite  On or about November 5, 2019, an employee was exposed to injuries associated with falling while wearing a body belt as component of a personal fall arrest system such as slipping out of the body belt while unconscious, internal injuries from sudden stop forces on the torso and/or asphyxiation from prolonged suspension.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $4,376
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.  Location: Jobsite  On or about October 28th 2019 and employee was injured from a fall while working on a roof while connected to a anchor bracket that was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person and became detached from the structure when the employee fell from the roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $4,376
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level.  Location: Jobsite  On or about October 28 2019, an employee was injured from a fall of 16 feet to the ground below while working where the fall arrest system was not capable of preventing contact with the next lower level or limiting the free fall to not more than six feet.    Actual accident. October 28, 2019, Employee fell 16 feet and made contact with ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii)  Location: Jobsite  On or about November 5, 2019 employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to and over 16 feet from a rooftop to the ground below, where untrained employees were unable to recognize or avoid fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  Location: Jobsite  On or about November 5 2019 employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to 16 feet to the ground below while using an aluminum step ladder that was not extended at least three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Location: Jobsite  On or about November 5, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards associated with the use of portable ladders while working where ladder training had not been provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View CAG Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344416961.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.