Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION in PAR TANKER HANGAR ANDERSON AIR FORCE BASE, YIGO, GU 96929 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 344430178.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Core Tech International Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Core Tech International Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
PAR TANKER HANGAR ANDERSON AIR FORCE BASE
City
YIGO
State
GU
ZIP
96929
Mailing
388 SOUTH MARINE CORPS DRIVE SUITE 400, TAMUNING, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
320
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Feb 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,115 · Current $3,581 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (Construction Reference: 1926.103)   The written respiratory protection plan was not worksite specific.  The plan did not include specific procedures and elements for respirator use.  Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3580.5
  • — Z (S) $5115

1910.134 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 9, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1): 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):  The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees with facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face: (Construction Reference: 1926.103)  Layout area:  A welder with facial hair was wearing a dual cartridge tight fitting respirator while welding on galvanized metal.  The welder was exposed to welding fumes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the limitations and capabilities of the respirator: (Construction Reference: 1926.103)  Layout area: A welder wearing a 3M dual cartridge tight fitting respirator could not demonstrate knowledge of the limitations on respirator use.  A welder was medically qualified for restricted use of the respirator of only 1-2 hours per day and was not aware of the limitation.  Employee was exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 124 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer's written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present at the workplace:  (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  AAFB Tanker Hangar project:  A list of the hazardous chemicals such as Portland cement, fuels, and lubricants used at the worksite had not been developed.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:  (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  Front of Crane:  A bottle of  automatic transmission fluid was not labeled or marked to identify the product.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.351 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.351(e): Arc welding or cutting operation(s) were not shielded by noncombustible or flame proof screens to protect employees and other persons working in the vicinity from the direct rays of the arc:  Layout area:  The shielding screen was not used during welding operations.  Employees working in the area were exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Core Tech International Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344430178.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.