Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MICHAEL LEARY CONTRACTING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MICHAEL LEARY CONTRACTING, INC. in 25 PATHWOODS AVE, BURLINGTON, MA 01803 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344439898.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Michael Leary Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Michael Leary Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25 PATHWOODS AVE
City
BURLINGTON
State
MA
ZIP
01803
Mailing
251 WORTHEN ROAD EAST, LEXINGTON, MA 02421
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a hoist as a ladder.   Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, employees were exposed to falls and possible collapse while using a material hoist as a ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the jobsite was not regularly inspected by a competent person for hazards which could injure or kill employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 15, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the employer did not train employees in the recognition and avoidance of hazards related to falling object struck by hazards, electrical hazards and the use of platform hoists.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the employer did not train employees, exposed to fall hazards, in the recognition and avoidance of hazards related to falls in construction.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 15, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:   Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the employer did not train employees, exposed to ladder hazards, in the recognition and avoidance of hazards related to ladders in construction.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the employees working on the ground, below the employees working on the roof, were not wearing head protection and exposed to objects dropped or falling from the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:   Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the employees working on and around the aluminum platform hoist, erected within inches of the uninsulated electric service drop, were not protected from electric shocks/burns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, employees engaged in roofing work were not protected from falls of over 12 feet to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): Unless the snaphook is a locking type and designed for the following connections, snaphooks shall not be engaged directly to webbing, rope or wire rope.  Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the snaphooks of the PFAS vertical lifelines, used by employees as fall protection, were wrapped around the ridge beam and engaged directly to the rope lifeline.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: On or about 9/20/19, the blue fiberglass extension ladder used by employees to access the roof did not extend 3-feet beyond the roof surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:     Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: a) On or about 9/20/19, the damaged 32ft aluminum extension ladder used by employees to access the roof was not periodically inspected by a competent person.  b) On or about 9/20/19, the damaged 16ft blue fiberglass extension ladder used by employees to access the roof was not periodically inspected by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2019
Abate by
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.    Location: 25 Pathwoods Ave., Burlington, MA: a) On or about 9/20/19, the damaged 32ft aluminum extension ladder used by employees to access the roof was not tagged or removed from service.  b) On or about 9/20/19, the damaged 16ft blue fiberglass extension ladder used by employees to access the roof was not tagged or removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Michael Leary Contracting, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344439898.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.