BRAINTREE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC. in 200 COMMERCE DRIVE, BRAINTREE, MA 02184 (NAICS 424460). OSHA activity number 344515002.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC.
- Site address
- 200 COMMERCE DRIVE
- City
- BRAINTREE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02184
- Mailing
- 200 COMMERCE DRIVE, BRAINTREE, MA 02184
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424460
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $9,446
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge: Location: Value Added Room Employees were exposed to potential cold-related and fire-related hazards while working inside the spiral freezer where the interior door knobs were missing, preventing prompt exit if the door closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9446
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.38 F01
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1): The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered under the plan when the plan was developed or when employees initially were assigned to a job. Location: Channel Fish Processing Company, 200 Commerce Drive Braintree, MA The employer did not review the Emergency Action Plan with the contractors cleaning the machinery within the facility where the standards required the employer to do so which exposed the contractors to entrapment during emergencies due to chemical release, weather, violence in the workplace and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $9,446
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces: Location:Value Added Room An evaluation of the workplace was not done where a sub-contractor entered an I.Q.F. Spiral Freezer to clean the interior while being exposed to running fans, a running spiral belt conveyor system, hot water, foam gel soap and hyperthermia hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9446
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.146 C08 I
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(8)(i): When an employer arranged to have employees of another employer (contractor) perform work that involved permit space entry, the host employer did not inform the contractor that the workplace contained permit spaces and that permit space program meeting the requirement of section was required. Location: Value Added Room The employer failed to inform contractors hired to clean, that the workplace contained permit spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C08 II
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(8)(ii): When an employer arranged to have employees of another employer (contractor) perform work that involved permit space entry, the host employer did not apprise the contractor of the elements, including the hazards identified and the host employer's experience with the space, that make the space in question a permit space: Location: Value Added Room The employer failed to inform contractors hired to clean the I.Q.F. Spiral Freezer of the hazards that make the freezer a confined space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C08 III
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(8)(iii): When an employer arranged to have employees of another employer (contractor) perform work that involved permit space entry, the host employer did not apprise the contractor of any precautions or procedures that the host employer implemented for protection of employees in or near permit spaces where the contractor will be working: Location: Value Added Room The employer failed to inform contractors hired to clean, of any precautions or procedures implemented to protect employees working in or near the I.Q.F. Freezer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 F02 I
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $9,446
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): Whenever outside personnel were engaged in activities covered by the scope and application of this standard, the on-site employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures: Location: Dry Room Contractors were exposed to electrical, thermal, cold and mechanical hazards while cleaning equipment including, but not limited to, Advanced I.Q.F Spiral Freezers, deep frying machines, breading machine, battering machines and conveyor systems where the employer and the contractor failed to inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9446
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 8, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $2,699 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met: Employee(s) were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to ammonia, bleach, caustic cleaner, foaming caustic cleaner, iodine, chlorinated foaming detergent and hydraulic oil where a written hazardous communication program that included the following elements was not provided: 1) Requirement for labeling and other forms of warning; 2) Safety data sheet availability; 3) Employee information and training; 4) A list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace; 5) Methods to inform employees of the hazards on non-routine tasks; and 6) Methods to provide other employer(s) access to safety data sheet; information on any precautionary measures and the labeling system used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2699
- — Z (S) $5398
More inspections at Channel Fish Processing CO., INC.
View Channel Fish Processing CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424460)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344515002.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.