PLAIN CITY, OH —
OSHA Inspection: COLUMBUS COPPER AND SLATE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COLUMBUS COPPER AND SLATE in 8660 MCKITRICK ROAD, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344545579.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLUMBUS COPPER AND SLATE
- Site address
- 8660 MCKITRICK ROAD
- City
- PLAIN CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43064
- Mailing
- 8036 CORPORATE BLVD SUITE B, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $2,227 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or before January 8, 2020, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program such as but not limited to a fall protection and scaffold safety program, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards of up to 30 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2226.5
- — Z (S) $4453
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied. a. On or before January 8, 2020, where a telehandler forklift was used to support a scaffold platform, the platform was not secured to the forklift, thereby exposing employees to a 30-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4453
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $2,227 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): No modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment shall be made without the manufacturer's written approval. If such modifications or changes are made, the capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction plates, tags, or decals shall be changed accordingly. In no case shall the original safety factor of the equipment be reduced. a. On or before January 8, 2020, where a telehandler forklift was modified by the addition of a personnel platform for employees to work from while conducting roofing work, the employer failed to obtain the forklift manufactures' written permission and the plates, tags, or decals were not changed, thereby exposing the employees to a 30-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2226.5
- — Z (S) $4453
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $8,905 · Current $4,453 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or before January 8, 2020, where an employee was installing slate to the roof of a house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 27-foot fall hazard. b. On or before January 8, 2020, where an employee was installing slate to the side of a dormer located on the roof of a house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to an 18-foot fall hazard. Columbus Copper and Slate was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1053167, citation number 1, item number 2b and was affirmed as a final order on June 24, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 393 N. Columbia Ave, Bexley, OH 43209.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4452.5
- — Z (R) $8905
More inspections at Columbus Copper and Slate
View Columbus Copper and Slate's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344545579.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.