Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: E & M CONSTRUCTION INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of E & M CONSTRUCTION INC. in 2 BOLAND WAY, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344555537.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch E & M Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E & M Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2 BOLAND WAY
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01115
Mailing
2 NIANTIC TRAIL, WEST GREENWICH, RI 02817
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2020
Abate by
Aug 3, 2020
Penalty
Initial $433 · Current $433
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  As of June 17, 2020, the employer had not certified that the abatement was completed for Citation 1, items 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f, and Citation 2, item 1, from Inspection 1455553, issued March 4, 2020, with a final order date of March 30, 2020.  Abatement certification for Citation 1, items 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f, and Citation 2, item 1 was due on April 20, 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $433

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $3,084
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees were required to wear filtering facepiece respirators (FFPD) and allowed to voluntarily wear half-face, tight fitting, negative pressure elastomeric respirators without an established written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees were not provided medical evaluations or instructed how to clean, store or maintain respirators prior to being allowed to voluntarily wear half-face elastomeric respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees were not provided medical evaluations prior to being required to wear filtering facepiece respirators and allowed to voluntarily wear half-face elastomeric respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees were not fit tested prior to being required to wear filtering facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees required to wear filtering facepiece respirators were allowed to have facial hair which came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, employees were not provided training prior to being required to wear filtering facepiece respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2020
Abate by
Apr 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  In the Ballroom at 2 Boland Way, Springfield, MA, on and before January 14, 2020, an employee was allowed to wear a half-face elastomeric respirator on a voluntary bases, however was not provided basic advisory information as presented of Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View E & M Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344555537.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.