Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GOYA FOODS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOYA FOODS, INC. in 1401 REMINGTON BLVD., BOLINGBROOK, IL 60490 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 344607692.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Goya Foods, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Goya Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GOYA FOODS, INC.
Site address
1401 REMINGTON BLVD.
City
BOLINGBROOK
State
IL
ZIP
60490
Mailing
1401 REMINGTON BLVD., BOLINGBROOK, IL 60490
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
300
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2020
Abate by
May 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $9,446 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:     a) Bean Room - On or about January 31, 2020, the employer failed to provide training to each authorized employee performing service and/or maintenance to machinery or equipment to ensure the employee acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices.   A machine operator sustained an amputation of the left index finger tip while unjamming the Hayssen Ultima packaging machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $9446
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.147 C07 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:    a) Bean Room - On or about January 31, 2020, the employer failed to provide training to each affected employee to ensure the purpose and function of the energy control program were understood.  Employees were thereby exposed to injuries associated with the unexpected energization and/or startup of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2020
Abate by
May 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $9,446 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    a. Bean Room - On or about January 31, 2020, an employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts while clearing a jam from the Hayssen Ultima packaging machine.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)((i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $9446
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 300 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2020
Abate by
May 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  a) Goya Foods, Inc., Bolingbrook, Illinois - On or about February 5, 2020, the employer failed to verify and provide written certification that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Goya Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344607692.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.