WORCESTER, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: TRICAB (USA) INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRICAB (USA) INC. in 15 COPPAGE DR, WORCESTER, MA 01603 (NAICS 331421). OSHA activity number 344620521.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRICAB (USA) INC.
- Site address
- 15 COPPAGE DR
- City
- WORCESTER
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01603
- Mailing
- 15 COPPAGE DR, WORCESTER, MA 01603
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331421
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $4,723 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: Copper line and tin lines, Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On 2/28/20, a machine operator was exposed to 173% of the action level (AL) for noise, which is equivalent to 93.9 dBA as a 12-hour time-weighted average (TWA), and the employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program. Sampling was conducted for 716 minutes, and the AL adjustment for 12-hour shifts for a 50% dose is 82.1 dBA.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $4723
- · I (S) $4723
- · Z (S) $9446
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceeded the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: On 2/28/20, a machine operator working on the copper and tin lines was exposed to 93.9 dBA as a 12-hour time-weighted average (TWA). The action level for a 12-hour exposure is 82.1 dBA. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: On 2/28/20, a machine operator working on the copper and tin lines was exposed to 93.9 dBA as a 12-hour time-weighted average (TWA). The action level for a 12-hour exposure is 82.1 dBA. The employer did not provide audiometric testing.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): On 2/28/20, a machine operator working on the copper and tin lines was exposed to 93.9 dBA as a 12-hour time-weighted average (TWA). The action level for a 12-hour exposure is 82.1 dBA. The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $8,096 · Current $4,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Tin line, Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On or about 2/11/20, a machine operator was exposed to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid, and the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $4048
- · I (S) $4048
- · Z (S) $8096
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: (a) Copper line, Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On or abour 2/11/20, a white two-gallon container with attached sprayer, which contained Superclean Degreaser, which contains sodium hydroxide, was not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals. (b) Copper line: On or about 2/11/20, the rodbreaker, which contained hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, Soluble Oil Conditioner No. 200G, which contains hexahydro-1,3,5-tris (2-hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine, was not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals. (c) Tin lines: On or about 2/11/20, the tin line tanks, which contained hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid, were not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Tin line, Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On or about 2/11/20, a machine operator was exposed to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid, and he was not provided effective information and training.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): Post the annual summary: Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On or about 2/11/20, the employer did not post the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $675
- · Z (O) $1350
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The employer did not ensure the floor of each workroom is maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition. When wet processes are used, drainage was not maintained and, to the extent feasible, dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats were not provided: Copper line, Tricab (USA) Inc., 15 Coppage Dr, Worcester MA: On or about 2/11/20, a machine operator was exposed to a slip/fall hazard due to fluid on the floor, containing oil, from the rodbreaker, and drainage was not maintained, and dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats were not provided.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Tricab (USA) INC.
View Tricab (USA) INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331421)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344620521.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.