Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RANDOLPH PACKING CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RANDOLPH PACKING CO. in 275 ROMA JEAN PARKWAY, STREAMWOOD, IL 60107 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 344661533.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Randolph Packing CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Randolph Packing CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
275 ROMA JEAN PARKWAY
City
STREAMWOOD
State
IL
ZIP
60107
Mailing
275 ROMA JEAN PARKWAY, STREAMWOOD, IL 60107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
96
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,049 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): (2) The floor of each workroom is maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition.  When wet processes are used, drainage must be maintained and, to the extent feasible, dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats must be provided.      a) Production Room - On February 27, 2020, the employer did not ensure that the floor was maintained in a dry condition to prevent slip and fall hazards.  The floor was wet from the runoff water accumulated on the floor from the sanitation spray.    b) Cook Room - On February 27, 2020, the employer did not ensure that the floor was maintained in a dry condition to prevent slip and fall hazards.  The floor was wet with water mixed in with bits of meat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $4049

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items (a) through (d) of this section:     a) Production Area - On February 27, 2020, the employer did not ensure that the energy control procedures that were established, were specific to the equipment such as the Nemag Stuffer, Linker, Link Cutter, Bulk Cutter, AFEC Mixer, and Galaxy Package Wrapper machines, and clearly outlined the following: a specific statement of the intended use of the procedure (servicing, maintenance, and/or un-jamming), procedural steps for shutting down, isolating and securing the machine to control hazardous energy (electrical, and pneumatic), procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them, and specific requirements for testing the machine to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices and other energy control measures.  The lockout program outlined general lockout procedures but equipment specific procedures had not been developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:         a) Facility Wide - On February 27, 2020, a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure(s) was not performed at least annually to identify potential deficiencies and to ensure skill proficiency was maintained while utilizing the procedure(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Each affected employee(s) were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:    a) Grinding Room  On February 27, 2012, the employer did not train all affected employee(s), including the grinding machine operator, to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by them, when servicing and maintenance was performed on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a) Shipping and Receiving Area - On February 27, 2020, the employer failed to ensure that employee(s) who operate the Crown, S200, serial #9A228492, were properly trained, evaluated and certified to operate it in a safe manner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,588 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) Shipping and Receiving Department - On or about February 26, 2020, the point of operation was not guarded on the Selco Baler, model #V5-HD, serial #089664449, the shut-off switch was not connected and thus did not stop the ram when baler door was opened.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $4588

View Randolph Packing CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344661533.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.