PORTLAND, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: TRADER JOE'S
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of TRADER JOE'S in 87 MARGINAL WAY, PORTLAND, ME 04101 (NAICS 445110). OSHA activity number 344696646.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRADER JOE'S
- Site address
- 87 MARGINAL WAY
- City
- PORTLAND
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04101
- Mailing
- 87 MARGINAL WAY, PORTLAND, ME 04101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 445110
- Employees
- 165
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,178 · Current $2,089 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: Back Stock Area: The egress route was obstructed by stacked boxes and grocery bags full of merchandise.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2089
- · Z (S) $4178
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: Establishment - The portable fire extinguisher was not readily accessible as it was obstructed by crates, trash container, and pallet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $8,193 · Current $4,097 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Establishment - The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if exposure to a corrosive chemical, necessitates the use of eye protection and other PPE.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4096.5
- · Z (S) $8193
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $6,554 · Current $3,277 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Establishment- The employer did not maintain an effective written hazard communication program that included the new sections of a safety data sheet and a list of hazardous chemicals used at the site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3277
- · Z (S) $6554
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: Establishment - The employer did not maintain workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for all hazardous chemicals used at the facility, including CLR, ALPET Surface Sanitizer, and Buckeye Green Light Super Concentrated Floor Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $28,915 · Current $14,458 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees received training and information on the hazardous chemicals used in their work areas. Trader Joe's was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1105476, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on December 31, 2015 with respect to a workplace located at 9205 S. Dixie Hwy, Miami, Florida 33156.
Recent events (2)
- · I (R) $14457.5
- · Z (R) $28915
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): 29 CFR 1910.151(c): When the eyes or body of any person were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Establishment - Suitable facilities, for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes, were not provided in the immediate work area for emergency use for employees using corrosives such as Buckeye Green Light Super Concentrated Floor Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Trader Joe'S
View Trader Joe'S's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 445110)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344696646.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.