DENVER, CO —
OSHA Inspection: FINLEY, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FINLEY, LLC in 1570 GROVE ST, DENVER, CO 80204 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 344710975.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FINLEY, LLC
- Site address
- 1570 GROVE ST
- City
- DENVER
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80204
- Mailing
- 203 HERON CT, BAILEY, CO 80421
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 H01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees were working in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or excavations in which water was accumulating, and adequate precautions had not been taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation: (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that each employee working inside an excavation that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth was protected from cave-in due to water accumulation, in that ground water was accumulating in the bottom of an excavation. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2892
- — Z (S) $2892
1926.652 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(b)(2): Maximum allowable slopes, and allowable configurations for sloping and benching systems, were not determined in accordance with the conditions and requirements set forth in Appendices A and B to this subpart: (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that each employee working inside an excavation, where groundwater had accumulated, that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth was protected from cave-in, in that the excavation was sloped at an angle greater than the 34 degree maximum allowable slope for type C soil and that the excavation was benched, which is prohibited by Appendix B for type C soil. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems: (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that daily inspections of an excavation that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth were made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in a hazardous condition, in that the competent person did not identify that submerged soil must be classified as type C soil and in that the competent person was not conducting manual soil analysis during excavation inspections or when conditions affecting the soils classification changed such as soil submerged with water. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $2892
- — Z (S) $2892
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a site specific written hazard communication program. Employees were potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to the following: 1) Christy's Red Hot Blue Glue Low VOC PVC Plastic Pipe Cement 2) MAINLINE Purple Low VOC Primer for PVC and CPVC Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.59.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1735
- — Z (S) $1735
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, the format of safety data sheets, and the format and availability of Globally Harmonized System labels for chemical containers. This condition potentially exposed employees to chemical hazards. Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.59.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.95 D01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(d)(1): The protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees: (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, PPE was not provided by the employer at no cost to the employees in that the employer required employees to purchase their own chemically resistant and cut resistant gloves. This condition potentially exposed employees to chemical and physical hazards, while laying pipe in an excavation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Finley, LLC
View Finley, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344710975.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.