Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FINLEY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FINLEY, LLC in 1570 GROVE ST, DENVER, CO 80204 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 344710975.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Finley, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Finley, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FINLEY, LLC
Site address
1570 GROVE ST
City
DENVER
State
CO
ZIP
80204
Mailing
203 HERON CT, BAILEY, CO 80421
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.651 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees were working in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or excavations in which water was accumulating, and adequate precautions had not been taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation:     (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that each employee working inside an excavation that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth was protected from cave-in due to water accumulation, in that ground water was accumulating in the bottom of an excavation. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $2892
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.652 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.652(b)(2):  Maximum allowable slopes, and allowable configurations for sloping and benching systems, were not determined in accordance with the conditions and requirements set forth in Appendices A and B to this subpart:  (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that each employee working inside an excavation, where groundwater had accumulated, that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth was protected from cave-in, in that the excavation was sloped at an angle greater than the 34 degree maximum allowable slope for type C soil and that the excavation was benched, which is prohibited by Appendix B for type C soil. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems:  (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the exposing, creating, and correcting employer did not ensure that daily inspections of an excavation that was approximately 18 feet wide and varied from 6.4 to 9.8 feet in depth were made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in a hazardous condition, in that the competent person did not identify that submerged soil must be classified as type C soil and in that the competent person was not conducting manual soil analysis during excavation inspections or when conditions affecting the soils classification changed such as soil submerged with water. This condition exposed employees and contractor employees to crushing hazards by excavation wall cave-in.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2892
  • — Z (S) $2892

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a site specific written hazard communication program. Employees were potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to the following:   1) Christy's Red Hot Blue Glue Low VOC PVC Plastic Pipe Cement 2) MAINLINE Purple Low VOC Primer for PVC and CPVC  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.59.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1735
  • — Z (S) $1735

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, the format of safety data sheets, and the format and availability of Globally Harmonized System labels for chemical containers. This condition potentially exposed employees to chemical hazards.  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.59.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.95 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2020
Abate by
Sep 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.95(d)(1): The protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees:   (a) Finley, LLC at 1570 Grove St., Denver, CO: On and around March 25, 2020, PPE was not provided by the employer at no cost to the employees in that the employer required employees to purchase their own chemically resistant and cut resistant gloves. This condition potentially exposed employees to chemical and physical hazards, while laying pipe in an excavation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Finley, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344710975.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.