MARSTON, MO —
OSHA Inspection: MAGNITUDE 7 METALS LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAGNITUDE 7 METALS LLC in 391 ST. JUDE INDUSTRIAL PARK, MARSTON, MO 63866 (NAICS 331312). OSHA activity number 344728688.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAGNITUDE 7 METALS LLC
- Site address
- 391 ST. JUDE INDUSTRIAL PARK
- City
- MARSTON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63866
- Mailing
- 391 ST. JUDE INDUSTRIAL PARK, MARSTON, MO 63866
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331312
- Employees
- 500
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01 II
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,916 · Current $4,916
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not communicate personal protection equipment selection decision(s) to each affected employee: The personal protection equipment (PPE) selection decision for the pot line transite pipe repair, was not communicated to maintenance employees who perform the work. The PPE hazard assessment that covers the pipe repair requires leather gloves, however, employees were not aware of that PPE assessment selection but instead wore cotton gloves. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4916
- — Z (S) $4916
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Magnitude 7 Metals personal protection equipment (PPE) hazard assessment was not certified according to the requirements at 1910.132(d)(2). Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01 II
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(ii): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE on knowing what PPE is necessary: The personal protection equipment (PPE) selection decision for the pot line transite pipe repair, required the use of leather gloves, however, employees were not aware of that PPE assessment selection but instead wore cotton gloves. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01 IV
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(iv): Employee(s) required to use PPE by this section were not trained to know the limitations of PPE: For transite pipe repair work on the pot line , where the PPE hazard assessment required the use of leather gloves, employees were not trained on the limitations of the use of leather gloves for protection from an electrical shock hazard. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.333 A02
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not deenergized (i.e., for reasons of increased or additional hazards or infeasibility), other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved: During pot line transite pipe repair work, where the pot line was energized and where there was a known potential electrical shock hazard, safety related work practices were not adequate to prevent an apparent electrical shock that occurred on approximately March 29, 2020. Administrative controls or personal protective equipment were not adequate, such as the use of an insulating mat or insulating gloves. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: During pot line transite pipe repair work, where the pot line was energized and where there was a known potential electrical shock hazard, personal protective equipment was not adequate to prevent an apparent electrical shock that occurred on approximately March 29, 2020. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Magnitude 7 Metals LLC
View Magnitude 7 Metals LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331312)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344728688.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.