Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RIO STONE GROUP, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of RIO STONE GROUP, LLC in 245 SCOTLAND DR., ALABASTER, AL 35007 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 344790324.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RIO Stone Group, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RIO Stone Group, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
245 SCOTLAND DR.
City
ALABASTER
State
AL
ZIP
35007
Mailing
245 SCOTLAND DR., ALABASTER, AL 35007
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 11 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2021
Abate by
Mar 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $438 · Current $438
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  (a) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item #1a issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/13/2021.  (b) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, Item #1b issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.  (c) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item #2 issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/13/2021.  (d) On or about  02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item #3 issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.  (e) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item #4a issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/13/2021.  (f) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item #4b issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.  (g) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item 4c issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.  (h) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #1, item # 4d issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.  (i) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #2, item #1a issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/13/2021.  (j) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #2, item #1b issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of  01/06/2021.  (k) On or about 02/18/2021, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation #2, item #1c issued on 12/09/2020 with an abatement due date of 01/06/2021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $438

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $3,084

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (dBA), or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer had not established a hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to noise hazards.  Employees operating equipment such as, but not limited to, hand grinders and polishers were exposed to an average noise level of 88.3 dBA.  Sampling was performed on October 09, 2020 for a period of 336 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 144 minutes.   (b) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer had not established a hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to noise hazards.  Employees operating equipment such as, but not limited to, hand grinders and polishers were exposed to an average noise level of 87.3 dBA.  Sampling was performed on October 09, 2020 for a period of 369 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 111 minutes.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $7802
  • — Z $15604
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.95 I02 II A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(i)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors were worn by all employees that a baseline audiogram pursuant to paragraph (g)(5)(ii) had not been established:   (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by an employee who had not had a baseline audiogram, and was exposed to noise greater than the action level of 85 dBA.   Employees operating equipment such as, but not limited to, hand grinders and polishers were exposed to an average noise level of 88.3 dBA.  Sampling was performed on October 09, 2020 for a period of 336 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 144 minutes.  (b) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by an employee who had not had a baseline audiogram, and was exposed to noise greater than the action level of 85 dBA.   Employees operating equipment such as, but not limited to, hand grinders and polishers were exposed to an average noise level of 87.3 dBA.  Sampling was performed on October 09, 2020 for a period of 369 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 111 minutes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $3,084
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, employees operating the Yale, Model #GLP050MXNEAB084, Serial #A390V06476S, propane powered forklift were not provided training.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $15604
  • — Z $31208
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,626 · Current $4,626
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Facility, employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards when using a damaged extension cord without inspecting it prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4626

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a)  On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department,  the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program, exposing employees to chemical bum hazards and fire hazards when working with hazardous chemicals including but not limited to NCF Stone Accelerator, Pectro Stone Brightener, Akemi Transformer, Quartz Toner Plus, and Stain Proof Waterbased Penetrating Sealer (Stain-Repella).
Recent events (3)
  • — I $5851
  • — Z $11702
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  (a)  On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer did not ensure that secondary containers of chemicals such as, but not limited to, Gran Quartz Lacquer Thinner were properly labeled.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a)  On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer did not maintain copies of safety data sheets for chemicals such as, but not limited to, NCF Stone Accelerator, Pectro Stone Brightener, Akemi Transformer, Quartz Toner Plus, and Stain Proof Waterbased Penetrating Sealer (Stain-Repella).
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, the employer did not provide training to employees who work with chemicals such as, but not limited to, Stone Accelerator, Pectro Stone Brightener, Akemi Transformer, Quartz Toner Plus, and Stain Proof Waterbased Penetrating Sealer (Stain-Repella).
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, a program had not been developed and implemented for employees required to wear 3M half face respirators when cutting stone countertops.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $2000
  • — Z $4000
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication Department, employees require to wear 3M half face respirators when cutting stone countertops had not been medically evaluated.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2020
Abate by
Jan 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about 06/16/2020 - Fabrication, employees required to wear 3M half face respirators when cutting stone countertops had not been fit tested.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View RIO Stone Group, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344790324.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.