HESSTON, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: AGCO CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AGCO CORPORATION in 420 W. LINCOLN BLVD., HESSTON, KS 67062 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 344802129.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AGCO CORPORATION
- Site address
- 420 W. LINCOLN BLVD.
- City
- HESSTON
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 67062
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 4000, HESSTON, KS 67062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333111
- Employees
- 21000
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.110 F06 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,783 · Current $4,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(6)(ii): Containers were not stored in a suitable enclosure or otherwise protected against tampering. Outside of Plant Seven at the Northeast corner Rack 8 the employer stored three portable LP gas cylinders outside of their enclosure rack, they were not in an enclosure and not protected against tampering, exposing employees to fire, struck-by or other hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $4048.1
- · Z (S) $5783
1910.178 L04 II B
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $5,398 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, was not provided to the operator when the operator has been involved in an accident or near-miss incident: Employees engaged in material handling activities at facility were exposed to struck-by hazards in that refresher training in relevant topics was not provided to forklift operators when four operators were involved in forklift safety incidents.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $5397.7
- · Z (S) $7711
1910.179 G01 V
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not clearly marked for identification of functions: In Plant One and Plant Three multiple Gantry Cranes had a unmarked pendant controls, exposing employees to an struck-by hazards in the following instances: 1) CM Lodestar 1/4 ton Crane #14116 2) CM Lodestar 1 ton Crane # 12250
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $9639
1910.184 C10
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $11,566 · Current $8,096 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(10): Hands or fingers were placed between the sling and its load while the sling was being tightened around the load: In Plant One, an employee engaged in material handling activities placed their hand between the alloy chain sling and tub while it was being tightened by the overhead crane, exposing the employee to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8096.2
- · Z (S) $11566
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,783 · Current $5,783
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach: In Plant Eight on the Large Square Bailer Line, the employer permitted the use of an alloy steel chain sling without a permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $5783
- · Z (S) $5783
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $11,566 · Current $8,096 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: In Tooling Department, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards. Employees engaged in maintenance activities, in that the point of operation was not guarded in the following instances: 1) Clausing Drill press Model 2277 S/N # 507276 2) Clausing Drill press Model 2277 S/N # 515972 3) Clausing Drill press Model 2277 S/N # 509148
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8096.2
- · Z (S) $11566
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $11,566 · Current $6,361 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: In the Autoshop and Tooling Department, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards. Employees engaged in production activities, were exposed to struck-by hazards in that machines were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving in the following instances: 1) Baldor Grinder Model # 7307 2) Clausing Drill press Model 2277 S/N # 509148
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $6361.3
- · Z (S) $11566
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,783 · Current $5,783
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: In Plant Four the service disconnect switches were obstructed by equipment, exposing employees to struck by, electrical, and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $5783
- · Z (S) $5783
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,783 · Current $5,783
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical In Plant One, the Weld Anti-Spatter container was not labeled, exposing employees to chemical hazards, such as eye irritation, skin dryness, and upper respiratory irritation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $5783
- · Z (S) $5783
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $385 · Current $385
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: Through all plants, employees engaged in material handing activities using the forklifts that were provided, were exposed to stuck-by hazards in that the following markings were not in place and legible in the following instances: 1) Toyota Forklift Model AFGU18 S/N 12741 missing side shift marking 2) Yale Forklift Model Number 4000 and S/N C810V05370L Missing up and down marking 3) Yale Forklift Model Number GLP050VXEURE084 S/N B875B01717C missing tilt marking 4) Yale Forklift Model Number Unknown and S/N Unknown missing up and down marking The AGCO Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.178(a)(6), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1172809, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/05/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 420 West Lincoln Blvd. Hesston, Kansas 67062.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $385
- · Z (R) $385
More inspections at Agco Corporation
View Agco Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333111)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344802129.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.