PAWTUCKET, RI —
OSHA Inspection: ARAUJO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ARAUJO CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 95 GRAND AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI 02861 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344845268.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARAUJO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 95 GRAND AVENUE
- City
- PAWTUCKET
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02861
- Mailing
- 162 BRAYTON AVENUE, SOMERSET, MA 02725
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $361 · Current $361
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) Establishment: As of February 9, 2021, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 1, Item 1 from inspection number 1484526, issued on 11/4/2020, with a final order date of 12/2/2020.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $361
1926.501 A02
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,181 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work on, had the strength and structural integrity to support employees safely: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that the roof work area being stripped, which was approximately fourteen feet seven inches above the lower level, had the structural integrity to support employees working on it.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $3181
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,181 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest system anchorages were fully secured in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, which calls for all screw holes to be used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $3181
1926.502 F01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1): Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that warning lines were erected around all sides of the roof work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 F01 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i): When no mechanical equipment was being used the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8m) from the roof edge: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that the warning line was set-up at least 6 feet from the roof edge. One section of the warning line was set-up approximately 3.5 feet from the roof edge, exposing the employee to an approximate fourteen foot, seven inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 F02 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/21/2020, the employer did not ensure that the warning line was consistently within the proper height range of 34 inches to 39 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Araujo Construction, INC.
View Araujo Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344845268.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.