Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J & G DRYWALL INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J & G DRYWALL INC in LOT 128 BRENNAN ROAD, WEXFORD, PA 15090 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 344942438.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J & G Drywall INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J & G Drywall INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J & G DRYWALL INC
Site address
LOT 128 BRENNAN ROAD
City
WEXFORD
State
PA
ZIP
15090
Mailing
500 LOGAN STREET, CARNEGIE, PA 15106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $11,838
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(5): Scaffolds were moved horizontally while employees were on them although the scaffolds were not designed for such movement by a registered professional engineer:   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was moving himself while he was on a manually propelled mobile scaffold.  The scaffold tipped over and the employee was severely injured.  The employee was at the top of the manually propelled mobile scaffold (12 feet 3 inches) when it fell over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (S) $9557

1926.452 W03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(3): Manual force used to move the scaffold was not applied as close to the base as practicable, but no more than 5 feet above the supporting surface:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was moving the manually propelled mobile scaffold while standing on it at the 12 feet 3 inch level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(5): Mobile scaffolds were not stabilized to prevent tipping during movement:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was working (installing drywall) from a manually propelled mobile scaffold and the scaffold was not protected from tipping during movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $11,838
29 CFR  1926.452(w)(6)(i): Employee(s) were allowed to ride on scaffolds when the surface on which the scaffold was moved was not within 3 degrees of level, and/or not free of pits, holes, and obstructions:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was moving a manually propelled mobile scaffold (Baker's scaffold) and there were (obstructions)  plastic banding straps on the floor where the scaffold was being moved.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $11,838
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:  (a) Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was working from a manually propelled scaffold and none of the wheels were locked in place.  The fall hazard to the employee was 12 feet 3 inches to a wooden floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (S) $9557

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer shall have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training shall include the following areas, as applicable:   (a)  Jobsite:   On  or about September 23, 2020,  two employees were building a manually propelled scaffold and one employee was working from the scaffolding and neither employee was trained in how to work safely when working with/on a scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, the manually propelled mobile scaffold was not visibly inspected for defects (i.e., wheels not locked, no guardrails) before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W06 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $11,838
29 CFR  1926.452(w)(6)(ii): Employee(s) were allowed to ride on a scaffold that had a height that was more than two times the base width and had not been designed and constructed to meet or exceed nationally recognized stability test requirements.   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was allowed to ride on a manually propelled mobile scaffold (Baker's scaffold) while he pulled/pushed the scaffold to move.  The height of the scaffold was 12 feet 3 inches and the width of the scaffold was 2 feet 5 inches.  This scaffold fell over and the employee was severely injured.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (S) $9557

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $11,838
29 CFR  1926.1052(c)(1)(ii):Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was using the stairway (to the upstairs of the residential home that was under construction) that had an open side.  The fall hazard to the employee was up to about 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1060 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(b):The employer did not provide retraining as necessary so that each employee exposed to fall hazards maintained the understanding and knowledge acquired through initial training:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, employees need to be retrained in how to minimize fall hazards when using stairways.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2021
Abate by
Mar 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $109,226 · Current $11,838 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level:  (a)  Jobsite:  On or about September 23, 2020, an employee was working from a manually propelled mobile scaffold and he was not protected from falling.  The fall hazard was about 12 foot 3 inches to the wooden floor.  The employee was installing insulation while he was standing at the 12 foot 3 inch level of the manually propelled mobile scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11838
  • — Z (W) $109226

View J & G Drywall INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344942438.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.