Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE A. ACOSTA PINEDA

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOSE A. ACOSTA PINEDA in 205 WOODLAND SKY DRIVE LOT# 91A, PATASKALA, OH 43062 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344993126.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose a. Acosta Pineda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose a. Acosta Pineda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
205 WOODLAND SKY DRIVE LOT# 91A
City
PATASKALA
State
OH
ZIP
43062
Mailing
1655 CARSTARE DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43227
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2021
Abate by
Feb 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a.  On or about October 26, 2020, located at Lot# 91A, 205 Woodland Sky Drive, Pataskala, Ohio: the employer did not initiate and maintain an effective safety and health program to ensure hazard detection and correction, while employees installed trusses at this worksite location for a new build residential home.  The employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards while they conducted the task.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2021
Abate by
Feb 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a.  On or about October 26, 2020, located at Lot# 91A, 205 Woodland Sky Drive, Pataskala, Ohio: the employer failed to instruct employees on the avoidance of unsafe conditions while they installed trusses at the interior and exterior wall of the first floor level of a new build residential home.  The employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards while they conducted the task as a result.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2021
Abate by
Feb 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a.  On or about October 26, 2020, located at Lot# 91A, 205 Woodland Sky Drive, Pataskala, Ohio: the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected from flying debris to their eyes, when they operated the pneumatic nail gun to install trusses. The employees were exposed to struck-by hazards as a result.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2021
Abate by
Feb 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a.  On or about October 26, 2020, located at Lot# 91A, 205 Woodland Sky Drive, Pataskala, Ohio: the employer failed to ensure that three employees who worked on top of the interior walls of of the first floor level of a new build residential home were protected from falling to the ground level.  The employees were exposed to a fall distance, without being protected from falling at approximately 9 feet 1 inch at the interior and 9 feet 10 inches at the exterior wall to the ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

View Jose a. Acosta Pineda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344993126.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.