Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE LUIS in 1915 FITZGERALD LANDING DRIVE, BOOTH, TX 77469 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344997572.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Luis — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Luis is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE LUIS
Site address
1915 FITZGERALD LANDING DRIVE
City
BOOTH
State
TX
ZIP
77469
Mailing
162 COUNTY FAIR, HOUSTON, TX 77060
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a)  At the worksite, employees were not provided with eye protection when using nail guns, exposing the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1735
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,733 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a)  At a residential home where employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while performing roofing work without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1733
  • — Z (S) $2892

View Jose Luis's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344997572.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.