Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VINTAGE BRICK SALVAGE, L.L.C.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VINTAGE BRICK SALVAGE, L.L.C. in 2510 20TH STREET, ROCKFORD, IL 61104 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 345063754.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vintage Brick Salvage, L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vintage Brick Salvage, L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2510 20TH STREET
City
ROCKFORD
State
IL
ZIP
61104
Mailing
2510 20TH STREET, ROCKFORD, IL 61104
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,172 Reduced

Hazardous substances 900091309135

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect employee health or whenever respirators are required by the employer, a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented:  On or about December 14, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory stressors associated with being required to wear 3M half-face tight-fitting respirators and/or Uline S-19253 dust masks (filtering facepieces). Employees were allowed to wear respirators  while performing tasks such as, but not limited to, cutting on reclaimed brick while being exposed to dust hazards that could potentially contain silica. The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program  that included medical evaluations, annual fit testing, and training requirements prior to respirator use onsite.    Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1172
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 900091309135

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about December 14, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory stressors associated with being required to wear 3M half-mask tight-fitting respirators and/or Uline S-19253 dust masks (filtering facepieces). Employees were allowed to wear respirators while performing tasks such as, but not limited to, cutting on reclaimed brick while being exposed to dust hazards that could potentially contain silica. The employer did not provide medical evaluations for these employees prior to respirator use onsite.    Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 900091309135

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:   On or about December 14, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory stressors associated with being required to wear 3M half-mask tight-fitting respirators and/or Uline S-19253 dust masks (filtering facepieces). Employees were allowed to wear respirators while performing tasks such as, but not limited to, cutting on reclaimed brick while being exposed to dust hazards that could potentially contain silica. The employer did not provide fit testing to employees prior to respirator use onsite.   Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 900091309135

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): : The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):   On or about December 14, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory stressors associated with being required to wear 3M half-mask tight-fitting respirators and/or Uline S-19253 dust masks (filtering facepieces). Employees were allowed to wear respirators while performing tasks such as, but not limited to, cutting on reclaimed brick while being exposed to dust hazards that could potentially contain silica. The employer did not provide effective training to employees prior to respirator use onsite.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,757 Reduced

Hazardous substances 900091309135

29 CFR  1910.141(d)(1):Washing facilities were not maintained in a sanitary condition:  On or about December 14, 2020 , employees were exposed to unsanitary conditions involving exposure to dust hazards that could potentially involve silica exposure. Employees were allow to eat and/or clean/wash their hands and other body parts inside the lunchroom and restroom area and the employer did not ensure areas were maintained in a sanitary condition.   Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1757
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,171 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.  On or about December 14, 2020, employees and/or management officials were exposed to propane and dust hazards while being required to change out propane tanks mounted on sit-down Toyota and Nissan powered industrial trucks and while wet cutting on reclaimed brick. The employer did not ensure that employees were provided effective training on the hazards to which they were exposed.   Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1171
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2021
Abate by
Mar 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about December 14, 2020, employees and/or management officials were exposed to propane and dust hazards while being required to change out propane tanks mounted on a sit-down Toyota and Nissan powered industrial truck and while cutting on reclaimed brick. The employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was developed and implemented onsite.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Vintage Brick Salvage, L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345063754.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.