Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: BOB SUMEREL TIRE COMPANY INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BOB SUMEREL TIRE COMPANY INC. in 737 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 336330). OSHA activity number 345080337.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BOB Sumerel Tire Company INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BOB Sumerel Tire Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
737 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
City
WOOSTER
State
OH
ZIP
44691
Mailing
737 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WOOSTER, OH 44691
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336330
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 G02

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $6,747 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(2):Scrapers, spuds, or other such tools used for cleaning purposes were not of nonsparking material:  On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to ensure that tools used for cleaning powder paint and primer in the Nordson Econocoat Series II Powder Booth were comprised of non-sparking materials.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $6747
  • · C (S) $13494
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,639 · Current $4,820 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(g)(2):The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to provide portable fire extinguisher training.   Note the employer may exercise one of the following options: 1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g). The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.   2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).   3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal. This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids). If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $4820
  • · C (S) $9639
  • · Z (S) $9639

1910.1000 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Jan 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of PNOR Total Dust listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15.00 mg/m3:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employee operating the powder coating painting equipment was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration of 35.136 milligrams total dust per cubic meter of air (mg/m3) which is 2.342 times the permissible exposure limit of 15.00 mg/m3. The sampling was performed for 442 minutes during one shift on July 29, 2020. Zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled period of time (38 minutes). Exposure to total dust causes cumulative lung disease in humans. Engineering and work practice controls can be used to reduce employee exposure.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13494
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.1000 E

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Jan 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):   On or about July 29, 2020, feasible engineering or administrative controls were not adequately implemented to keep employee exposure to air contaminants within the limits prescribed in the standard. The employee operating the powder coating painting equipment was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration of 35.136 milligrams total dust per cubic meter of air (mg/m3) which is 2.342 times the permissible exposure limit of 15.00 mg/m3. The sampling was performed for 442 minutes during one shift on July 29, 2020. Zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled period of time (38 minutes). Exposure to total dust causes cumulative lung disease in humans. Engineering and work practice controls can be used to reduce employee exposure.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Jan 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to develop and implement a respiratory protection program.   a). On or about July 29, 2020, the employee operating the powder coating painting equipment was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration of 35.136 milligrams total dust per cubic meter of air (mg/m3) which is 2.342 times the permissible exposure limit of 15.00 mg/m3. The sampling was performed for 442 minutes during one shift on July 29, 2020. Zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled period of time (38 minutes). Exposure to total dust causes cumulative lung disease in humans. Engineering and work practice controls can be used to reduce employee exposure.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 C01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $48,195 · Current $80,000
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:   a). On or about July 29, 2020, an employee spray painting(priming) was exposed to continuous noise at 103.2% of the action level (time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 90.2 dBA during the 470 minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 10 minutes not sampled.   b). On or about July 29, 2020, an employee spray painting was exposed to continuous noise at 131.42% of the action level (time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 92 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.   The Bob Sumerel Tire Company Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.95(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1277909, citation number 1, item number 2/a and was affirmed as a final order on 6/6/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 55 Leetsdale Industrial Drive, Leetsdale, PA 15056.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $80000
  • · C (R) $48195
  • · Z (R) $48195

1910.95 D01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1):When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to develop and implement a monitoring program to assess the noise level in the facility.   a). On or about July 29, 2020, an employee spray painting(priming) was exposed to continuous noise at 103.2% of the action level (time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 90.2 dBA during the 470 minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 10 minutes not sampled.   b). On or about July 29, 2020, an employee spray painting was exposed to continuous noise at 131.42% of the action level (time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 92 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.   The Bob Sumerel Tire Company Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.95(d)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1277909, citation number 1, item number 2/b and was affirmed as a final order on 6/6/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 55 Leetsdale Industrial Drive, Leetsdale, PA 15056.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $0
  • · C (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.95 G05 I

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i):The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to perform audiograms.   The Bob Sumerel Tire Company Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.95(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1277909, citation number 1, item number 2/a and was affirmed as a final order on 6/6/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 55 Leetsdale Industrial Drive, Leetsdale, PA 15056.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $0
  • · C (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.95 I03

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3):Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to provide multiple forms of hearing protection.   The Bob Sumerel Tire Company Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.95(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1277909, citation number 1, item number 2/a and was affirmed as a final order on 6/6/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 55 Leetsdale Industrial Drive, Leetsdale, PA 15056.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $0
  • · C (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.95 K01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:   On or about July 29, 2020, the employer failed to train employees in the hazards associated with noise and how to effectively wear hearing protection.   The Bob Sumerel Tire Company Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.95(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1277909, citation number 1, item number 2/a and was affirmed as a final order on 6/6/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 55 Leetsdale Industrial Drive, Leetsdale, PA 15056.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $0
  • · C (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

1910.107 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(l)(4)(iii): "No Smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not conspicuously posted at all powder coating areas and powder storage rooms:  On or about June 17, 2020, the employer failed to have "No Smoking" signs posted at all powder coating areas.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View BOB Sumerel Tire Company INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345080337.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.