Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ in 601 N. OAK ST., ROANOKE, TX 76262 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345082747.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Luis Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Luis Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ
Site address
601 N. OAK ST.
City
ROANOKE
State
TX
ZIP
76262
Mailing
2135 CUSTER DR, DALLAS, TX 75216
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2020
Abate by
Feb 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about October 2, 2020 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure employees were wearing safety glasses while operating nail guns when performing framing activity exposing the employees to eye hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.  On or about October 2, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employee(s) working on the east side of the apartment complex was not tied off while working inside the basket of a Sunbelt aerial lift; employee was exposed to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2020
Abate by
Feb 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about October 2, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employee working from an unguarded balcony without fall protection; employee exposed to a fall hazard of 20 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2020
Abate by
Feb 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.   On or about October 2, 2020 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to verify fall protection training to his employees while performing framing activity, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jose Luis Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345082747.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.