Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC in 5735 COLLEGE CORNER PIKE, OXFORD, OH 45056 (NAICS 335121). OSHA activity number 345090856.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schneider Electric — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schneider Electric is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC
Site address
5735 COLLEGE CORNER PIKE
City
OXFORD
State
OH
ZIP
45056
Mailing
5735 COLLEGE CORNER PIKE, OXFORD, OH 45056
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
335121
Employees
250
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,436 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable: 1910.134(c)(1)(I)Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; 1910.134(c)(1)(ii)Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; 1910.134(c)(1)(iii)Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; 1910.134(c)(1)(iv)Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; 1910.134(c)(1)(v)Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; 1910.134(c)(1)(vi)Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; 1910.134(c)(1)(vii)Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; 1910.134(c)(1)(viii) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and 1910.134(c)(1)(ix)Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.   a) On or about September 17, 2020, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory program for maintenance employees who were required to wear 3M 8210 N95 respirators while working on the powder coat dust collectors, which contained SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), and Armada dust collectors, which contained metal dust (combustible dust).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $3500
  • — C (S) $6436
  • — Z (S) $6436

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    a) On or about September 17, 2020, the employer had not provided a medical evaluation for maintenance employees who were required to wear a 3M 8210 N95 respirators while working on the powder coat dust collectors, which contained SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), and Armada dust collectors, which contained metal dust (combustible dust).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer shall ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.   a) On or about September 17, 2020, the employer did not fit-test the respirators for maintenance employees who were required to wear 3M 8210 N95 respirators while working on the powder coat dust collectors, which contained SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), and Armada dust collectors, which contained metal dust (combustible dust).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): Training and information. This paragraph requires the employer to provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive, understandable, and recur annually, and more often if necessary. This paragraph also requires the employer to provide the basic information on respirators in Appendix D of this section to employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so.   a) On or about September 17, 2020, the employer did not provided respirator training for maintenance employees who were required to wear 3M 8210 N95 respirators while working on the powder coat dust collectors, which contained SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), and Armada dust collectors, which contained metal dust (combustible dust).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 A03 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,436 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.141(a)(3)(i): All places of employment shall be kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allows.  a) On or about January 7, 2021, the employer failed to keep working areas clean in that employees were exposed to SOL DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole, (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), which was found to be coating the surfaces of objects, the floor, and the walls in the environmental room and around the powder coat line.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6436
  • — Z (S) $6436

1910.146 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(i): A space classified by the employer as a permit-required confined space may be reclassified as a non-permit confined space under the following procedures: 1910.146(c)(7)(i) If the permit space poses no actual or potential atmospheric hazards and if all hazards within the space are eliminated without entry into the space, the permit space may be reclassified as a non-permit confined space for as long as the non-atmospheric hazards remain eliminated.   a) From October 8, 2020 to January 4, 2021, the employer had reclassified and entered the powder coat process line, a permit required confined space, on 13 occasions without ensuring the space posed no actual or potential atmospheric hazards in order for maintenance employees to perform repairs and preventive maintenance. On the cure oven, the natural gas was not always gas locked out until November of 2020, the preheat oven and cure oven were not isolated from the natural gas lines as the isolation procedure was not correctly performed by all employees, and the atmosphere was not tested.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6000
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.146 D03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(d)(3)(i): Develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including, but not limited to, the following: Specifying acceptable entry conditions.  a) From October 8, 2020 to January 4, 2021,  the employer reclassified and entered the powder coat process line , a permit required confined space, on 13 occasions without implementing the means, procedure and practices specifying safe entry conditions  in order for maintenance employees to perform repairs and preventive maintenance. The cure oven did not have the natural gas locked out until November of 2020, the preheat oven and cure oven were not isolated from the natural gas using a double block and bleed, and the atmosphere was not tested in the spaces for natural gas, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and oxygen deficiency.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.146 D05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(d)(5)(i): Test conditions in the permit space to determine if acceptable entry conditions exist before entry is authorized to begin, except that, if isolation of the space is infeasible because the space is large or is part of a continuous system (such as a sewer), pre-entry testing shall be performed to the extent feasible before entry is authorized and, if entry is authorized, entry conditions shall be continuously monitored in the areas where authorized entrants are working;  a) From October 8, 2020 to January 4, 2021,  the employer reclassified and entered the powder coat process line, a permit required confined space, on 13 occasions without testing entry conditions for oxygen deficiency, natural gas, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen oxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(3): The training shall establish employee proficiency in the duties required by this section and shall introduce new or revised procedures, as necessary, for compliance with this section.   a) On or about October 8, 2020, the employer did not provide training when a procedure was changed in that that employees were not trained on locking out the natural gas on the cure oven for the powder coat line, an entry supervisor and employees were not trained on how to isolate the natural gas lines on the cure oven and preheat oven, and entry supervisors were not trained to test for the atmospheric hazards in the permit required confined space prior to entry for hazards such as oxygen deficiency, natural gas, carbon monoxide, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.146 J

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(j): Duties of entry supervisors. The employer shall ensure that each entry supervisor: 1910.146(j)(1) Knows the hazards that may be faced during entry, including information on the mode, signs or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure; 1910.146(j)(2) Verifies, by checking that the appropriate entries have been made on the permit, that all tests specified by the permit have been conducted and that all procedures and equipment specified by the permit are in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin.   a) On or about October 8, 2020, the employer had not ensured that each entry supervisor knew the hazards in the permit required confined spaced and verified that the appropriate entries had been made, all tests specified by the permit were conducted, and that the procedures were in place before endorsing the permit in that the entry supervisors failed to recognize the atmospheric hazards present from the natural gas and the byproducts from heating the SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole which created carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen oxide,  and had not ensure that employees were locking out the natural gas line on the cure oven, and had not ensured proper isolation of the natural gas line.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $6,436 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): Training. Employee training shall include at least: 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii)The physical, health, simple asphyxiation, combustible dust, and pyrophoric gas hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area; 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii) The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used.   a) On or about January 7, 2021, the employer had not provided training on SOL Epoxy DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole (a combustible dust; skin, mucous membrane, and eye irritant; allergic skin reaction, and inhalation hazard).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $2000
  • — C (S) $6436
  • — Z (S) $6436

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2021
Abate by
Apr 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.  a) On or about February 8, 2021, the employer had not identified and evaluated the respiratory hazards in the workplace in that employees were exposed to SOL DK15-0907 Epoxy Powder Phenol Novolac Epoxy 2-Methylimidazole, (skin and eye irritant, allergic reaction skin, mucous membrane irritant, inhalation hazard, combustible dust), for items such as but not limited to repairing pumps for the powder coat line, using compressed air to spray down the walls of the fluidized bed for the powder coat line, and replacing filters and performing cleaning of the powder coat dust collector.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Schneider Electric's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345090856.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.