SCRANTON, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: SCRANTON PRINTING COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCRANTON PRINTING COMPANY in 1225 PENN AVE, SCRANTON, PA 18509 (NAICS 323117). OSHA activity number 345091532.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCRANTON PRINTING COMPANY
- Site address
- 1225 PENN AVE
- City
- SCRANTON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18509
- Mailing
- 1225 PENN AVE, SCRANTON, PA 18509
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323117
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2021
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,901 · Current $2,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) Production area: The employer had not developed a machine specific procedure for the potentially hazardous energy for the Komori Lithrone 40 printer, on or about January 8, 2021. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2925
- · Z (S) $3901
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,121 · Current $2,325 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: a) Facility wide- The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator had been trained in accordance with 1910.178(l) to include both formal instruction and on the job training, on or about January 8, 2021.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2325
- · Z (S) $3121
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323117)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345091532.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.