Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INV PERFORMANCE MATERIALS, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of INV PERFORMANCE MATERIALS, LLC in 25876 DUPONT ROAD #8239, SEAFORD, DE 19973 (NAICS 325220). OSHA activity number 345093025.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch INV Performance Materials, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for INV Performance Materials, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25876 DUPONT ROAD #8239
City
SEAFORD
State
DE
ZIP
19973
Mailing
25876 DUPONT ROAD #8239, SEAFORD, DE 19973
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325220
Employees
137
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.145 F03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2021
Abate by
Jul 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $12,288 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.145(f)(3): Tags were not used as a means to prevent accidental injury or illness to employees who were exposed to hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions, equipment or operations which were out of the ordinary, unexpected or not readily:  a) 25876 Dupont Road, Seaford, DE 19973: On or about January 12, 2021, the employer did not provide the necessary labeling and/or tags on the  hopper where  their employees are tasked at  servicing/cleaning the flakes of poly in the immediate area [e.g. beneath and sides] around the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12288

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2021
Abate by
Jul 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $12,288 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):  a) 25876 Dupont Road, Seaford, DE 19973: On or about January 12, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the developed energy control procedures, identified specific steps to be followed to control hazardous energy for equipment (Hopper/Box) on which employees perform cleaning on and around the equipment.  NOTE: The procedures must be documented in sufficient detail and provide enough direction so that employees can effectively follow the procedure and determine how to safely perform the servicing and maintenance activities. Over generalization can result in a document which has little or no utility to the employee who must follow procedure. However, while the procedure is required to be written in detail, this does not mean that a separate procedure must be written for each and every machine or piece of equipment. Similar machines and/or equipment (those using the same type and magnitude energy) that has the same or similar types of controls can be covered with a single procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12288

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2021
Abate by
Jul 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   a) 25876 Dupont Road Seaford, DE: On or about January 12, 2021, the employer failed to ensure a review of the developed written energy control procedure was conducted at least annually.   Abatement Note:    1.  Where lockout should be used for energy control, the periodic inspection shall include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected.1910.147(c)(6)(i)(D)   2.  Where tagout  should be used for energy control, the periodic inspection shall include a review, between the inspector and each authorized and affected employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected, and the elements set forth in paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of this section.1910.147(c)(6)(ii)   3.  The employer shall certify that the periodic inspections have been performed. The certification shall identify the machine or equipment on which the energy control procedure was being utilized, the date of the inspection, the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2021
Abate by
Jul 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $12,288 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:  a) 25876 Dupont Road, Seaford DE: On or about January 12, 2021, employees who routinely clean in the immediately area of the Hopper/Box machine were not provided training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of energy available in the workplace and the methods & means necessary complete  energy isolation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12288

1910.212 A03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2021
Abate by
Jul 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $12,288 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  a) 25876 Dupont Road Seaford, DE- On or about January 12, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the blade was guarded , exposing employees to amputation hazards.  An employee engaged in cleaning around and beneath the Hopper/box  sustained a finger amputation after coming into contact with the blade during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12288

View INV Performance Materials, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345093025.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.