DUBLIN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ANGEL GARCIA
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANGEL GARCIA in 6817 OLIVER WAY LOT 18, DUBLIN, OH 43016 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345118293.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANGEL GARCIA
- Site address
- 6817 OLIVER WAY LOT 18
- City
- DUBLIN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43016
- Mailing
- 3505 BROOKSIDE BLVD, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer did not initiate and maintain a safety and health program to ensure hazard detection and correction, while employees conducted framing work to a new build residential home.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to instruct employees on the avoidance of unsafe conditions while they installed OSB sheathing and framing lumber for a new build residential home.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that an employee was protected from flying debris to their eyes. The employee had not used proper eye protection and was therefore exposed to struck-by hazards operating the pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that an employee was properly protected from falling when sheathing work was done on top of the steep pitched 6/12 roof top. b. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that an employee was protected from falling to ground level when framing work was done at the unprotected side and edge of the second floor level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows: a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the anchorage for the personal fall arrest system (PFAS) was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds when an employee used the anchorage point to attach to their lifeline for the full body harness.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder side rails extended at least three feet above the upper landing surface used to gain access to the working level at the back side of the new build residential home. b. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder side rails extended at least three feet above the upper landing surface used to gain access to the working level at the front side of the new build residential home.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders shall be used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder used at the back side of the new build residential home was on a stable and level surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B21
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2021
- Abate by
- May 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Each employee shall use at least one hand to grasp the ladder when progressing up and/or down the ladder. a. On or about January 27, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the employee used at least one hand to grasp the ladder while progressing up the ladder at the back side of the new build residential home.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Angel Garcia
View Angel Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345118293.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.