FRISCO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ in 9965 HOPPER RD., FRISCO, TX 75035 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345134134.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ
- Site address
- 9965 HOPPER RD.
- City
- FRISCO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75035
- Mailing
- 1421 CAMELIA DR., PLANO, TX 75074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas: (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees who were performing framing operations were exposed to wooden construction debris with protruding nails at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1755
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees working at ground level at the jobsite were exposed to falling and flying objects. Employees were not wearing protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1755
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees did not use appropriate eye protection when using pneumatic nail guns and Makita circular saws during framing operations at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees were working at the jobsite with a Makita circular saw and other equipment requiring electrical power were exposed to electrocution, and electrical shock hazards from a powered extension cord plugged into the jobsite electrical receptacle that had the power cord protective sleeve pulled out of the crimped clamp exposing the internal wiring. The power cord did not have a strain relief mechanism.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) On or about February 4, 2021 and times prior thereto; employees performing framing operations were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees were performing framing operations at the jobsite and were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees were performing framing operations at the jobsite and were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below, and the employer did not have a written training certification record.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2021
- Abate by
- May 13, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), were not equipped with at least one handrail: (a) On or about February 4, 2021, on the staircase of the residential home, the employer did not ensure that stairways having four or more risers rising more than 30 inches were equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge to protect employees from falling approximately 8- feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
More inspections at Rafael Rodriguez
View Rafael Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345134134.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.