Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ in 9965 HOPPER RD., FRISCO, TX 75035 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345134134.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rafael Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rafael Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ
Site address
9965 HOPPER RD.
City
FRISCO
State
TX
ZIP
75035
Mailing
1421 CAMELIA DR., PLANO, TX 75074
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR  1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees who were performing framing operations were exposed to wooden construction debris with protruding nails at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees working at ground level at the jobsite were exposed to falling and flying objects. Employees were not wearing protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees did not use appropriate eye protection when using pneumatic nail  guns and Makita circular saws  during framing operations at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   (a) On or about February 4, 2021, employees were working at the jobsite with a Makita circular saw and other equipment requiring electrical power were exposed to electrocution, and electrical shock hazards from a powered extension cord plugged into the jobsite electrical receptacle that had the power cord protective sleeve pulled out of the crimped clamp exposing the internal wiring. The power cord did not have a strain relief mechanism.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) On or about February 4, 2021 and times prior thereto; employees performing framing operations were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees were performing framing operations at the jobsite and were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021 employees were performing framing operations at the jobsite and were exposed to the hazard of falling 10-feet to the ground below, and the employer did not have a written training certification record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2021
Abate by
May 13, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), were not equipped with at least one handrail:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021, on the staircase of the residential home, the employer did not ensure that stairways having four or more risers rising more than 30 inches were equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge to protect employees from falling approximately 8- feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

View Rafael Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345134134.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.