Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARGO INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARGO INDUSTRIES, INC. in 4430 NORTH 127TH STREET, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 345134241.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Argo Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Argo Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4430 NORTH 127TH STREET
City
BROOKFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53005
Mailing
4430 NORTH 127TH STREET, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2021
Abate by
Aug 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $5,461
29 CFR  1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspection. The following items shall be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. All deficiencies such as listed shall be carefully examined and determination made as to whether they constitute a safety hazard:  (a)  On or about February 4, 2021 the employer did not ensure that frequent inspection (daily to monthly interval) of the overhead cranes were performed to identify hazards such as defective brakes.  This exposed employees to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5461
  • — Z (S) $5461

1910.179 L03 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.179(l)(3)(i):Unsafe condition(s) disclosed during the frequent or periodic inspection(s) required by 29 CFR 1910.179(j) were not corrected before operation of the crane(s) was resumed:  (a)  On or about February 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that unsafe conditions (faulty brakes)were corrected on overhead cranes (Superior 10 Ton Crane (North Crane)) before operation of the crane was resumed. This exposed employees to crushing hazards.  (b)  On or about February 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that unsafe conditions (trolley did not move East and West ) were corrected on overhead cranes (Superior 10 Ton Crane (South Crane)) before operation of the crane was resumed. This exposed employees to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5461

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 17 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2021
Abate by
Aug 25, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,316 · Current $3,316
29 CFR  1910.184(d): Each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not being inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021 the employer did not ensure that slings were inspected (daily) to ensure they were not damaged or defective. This exposed employees to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3316
  • — Z (S) $3316

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2021
Abate by
Jul 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,316 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.184(e)(1):Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  (a) On or about February 4, 2021 the employer did not ensure that alloy steel slings were affixed with durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach. This exposed employees to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3316

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,316 · Current $3,316
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a)  On or about February 4, 2021, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on and around the AccurPress Press Brake (Model #717512 and Serial #1920), and the employer did not ensure the point of operation was properly guarded.  (b)  On or about February 4, 2021, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working on and around the AccurShear (Model #650012 and Serial #4830), and the employer did not ensure the point of operation was properly guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3316
  • — Z (S) $3316

View Argo Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345134241.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.