Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS MENDOZA-GUTIERREZ DBA MENDOZA GUTIERREZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS MENDOZA-GUTIERREZ DBA MENDOZA GUTIERREZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 403 WEBB ST., CALUMET CITY, IL 60409 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345202477.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Mendoza-Gutierrez DBA Mendoza Gutierrez Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Mendoza-Gutierrez DBA Mendoza Gutierrez Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
403 WEBB ST.
City
CALUMET CITY
State
IL
ZIP
60409
Mailing
7818 S. KEATING AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60652
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2021
Abate by
May 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns were not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing the employees to hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):  Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  a.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, two portable ladders used to access the roof from the front of the house were extended approximately two (2) feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, a portable ladder used to access the roof from the back of the house was extended approximately one (1) foot six (6) inches above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1650
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,022 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eleven (11) feet eight (8) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10) feet seven (7) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  Luis Gutierrez dba Luis Gutierrez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1268195, citation number  1, item number 1-a, and was affirmed as a final order on March 27, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 17864 Martie Rd. in Mokena, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $5000
  • — Z (R) $7022

1926.503 B01

Repeat 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2021
Abate by
Jul 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $219 · Current $100 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about March 17, 2021, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification record of the training.  Luis Gutierrez dba Luis Gutierrez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1268195, citation number  1, item number 1-b, and was affirmed as a final order on March 27, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 17864 Martie Rd. in Mokena, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $100
  • — Z (R) $219

View Luis Mendoza-Gutierrez DBA Mendoza Gutierrez Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345202477.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.