Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP LLC in ASCEND - CHOCOLATE BAYOU FM 2917, ALVIN, TX 77512 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 345225080.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turner Industries Group LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turner Industries Group LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ASCEND - CHOCOLATE BAYOU FM 2917
City
ALVIN
State
TX
ZIP
77512
Mailing
8687 UNITED PLAZA BOULEVARD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70809
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
600
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 H03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(I): The contract employer did not assure that each contract employee is trained in the work practices necessary to safely perform his/her job.  IN THE ALTERNATIVE  29 CFR  1910.119(j)(3):The employer did not train each employee involved in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to ensure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner:  On or about March 29, 2021, the employer did not did not ensure employees were trained in the work practices necessary to safely replace the gasket in the superheat steam coil circuit piping of the AN2 Unit Number 3 Reactor.  a) Boilermaker foreman was not trained b) Boilermaker 1 was not trained c) Boilermaker 2 was not trained d) Boilermaker 3 was not trained
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.119 H03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.119(h)(3)(iii): Contract employer did not document that each contract employee received and understood the training required by this paragraph to include a record which contained the identify of the contract employee, date of the training, and means used to verify understanding of the training.    On or about March 29, 2021,  the contract employer did not document that each employee received and understood the training required for safely opening and working on steam and condensate systems.  a) Boilermaker foreman  b) Boilermaker 1 c) Boilermaker 2 d) Boilermaker 3
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Sep 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $4,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(a):Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  On or about March 29, 2021 on the coil deck of Reactor 3 in the AN2 Unit, the employer did not ensure that its employees wore PPE to prevent thermal burns from contact with hot condensate while working  around a flange that was opened to repair a steam leak.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4500
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.132 D01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1)(i):The employer did not select and have each affected employee use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:  On or about March 29, 2021 in the AN 2 Unit, the employer did not have each affected employee use personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect against steam and condensate contacting the worker's body, while working on opened steam and condensate carrying equipment.    a) Boilermaker Foreman did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment.   b) Boilermaker 1 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment.   c) Boilermaker 2 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment.   d) Boilermaker 3 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2021
Abate by
Oct 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes.  On or about March 29, 2021 in the AN Unit 2, the employer did not require employees use appropriate hand protection when workers hands were exposed to thermal burn hazards while working on the superheat steam coil of the Number 3 Reactor.    a) Boilermaker Foreman hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system.   b) Boilermaker 1 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system.   c) Boilermaker 2 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system.   d) Boilermaker 3 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Turner Industries Group LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345225080.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.