ALVIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP LLC in ASCEND - CHOCOLATE BAYOU FM 2917, ALVIN, TX 77512 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 345225080.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP LLC
- Site address
- ASCEND - CHOCOLATE BAYOU FM 2917
- City
- ALVIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77512
- Mailing
- 8687 UNITED PLAZA BOULEVARD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70809
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 600
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 H03 I
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(I): The contract employer did not assure that each contract employee is trained in the work practices necessary to safely perform his/her job. IN THE ALTERNATIVE 29 CFR 1910.119(j)(3):The employer did not train each employee involved in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to ensure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner: On or about March 29, 2021, the employer did not did not ensure employees were trained in the work practices necessary to safely replace the gasket in the superheat steam coil circuit piping of the AN2 Unit Number 3 Reactor. a) Boilermaker foreman was not trained b) Boilermaker 1 was not trained c) Boilermaker 2 was not trained d) Boilermaker 3 was not trained
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13653
- — Z (S) $13653
1910.119 H03 III
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iii): Contract employer did not document that each contract employee received and understood the training required by this paragraph to include a record which contained the identify of the contract employee, date of the training, and means used to verify understanding of the training. On or about March 29, 2021, the contract employer did not document that each employee received and understood the training required for safely opening and working on steam and condensate systems. a) Boilermaker foreman b) Boilermaker 1 c) Boilermaker 2 d) Boilermaker 3
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $13,653 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a):Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: On or about March 29, 2021 on the coil deck of Reactor 3 in the AN2 Unit, the employer did not ensure that its employees wore PPE to prevent thermal burns from contact with hot condensate while working around a flange that was opened to repair a steam leak.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $4500
- — C (S) $13653
- — Z (S) $13653
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i):The employer did not select and have each affected employee use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment: On or about March 29, 2021 in the AN 2 Unit, the employer did not have each affected employee use personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect against steam and condensate contacting the worker's body, while working on opened steam and condensate carrying equipment. a) Boilermaker Foreman did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment. b) Boilermaker 1 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment. c) Boilermaker 2 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment. d) Boilermaker 3 did not use personal protective equipment required for working around opened steam and condensate containing equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2021
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes. On or about March 29, 2021 in the AN Unit 2, the employer did not require employees use appropriate hand protection when workers hands were exposed to thermal burn hazards while working on the superheat steam coil of the Number 3 Reactor. a) Boilermaker Foreman hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system. b) Boilermaker 1 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system. c) Boilermaker 2 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system. d) Boilermaker 3 hands were exposed to thermal burns when appropriate hand protection was not required and utilized while repairing the piping joint in the superheat steam coil system.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Turner Industries Group LLC
View Turner Industries Group LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345225080.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.