Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EATON CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EATON CORPORATION in 7000 HIGHLANDS PKWY. SE SUITE 101, ATLANTA, GA 30303 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 345239610.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eaton Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eaton Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EATON CORPORATION
Site address
7000 HIGHLANDS PKWY. SE SUITE 101
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30303
Mailing
7000 HIGHLANDS PKWY. SE SUITE 101, ATLANTA, GA 30303
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
1000
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.269 A04 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2021
Abate by
Oct 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $20,480
1910.269(a)(4)(iv)  The presence of protective grounds and equipment grounding conductors, 29 C.F.R. � 1910.269(a)(4)(iv): The employer did not verify the presence of protective grounds and equipment grounding conductors.  In The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Co. Building 79, Albany, Georgia: On or about March 24, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that the local electric distribution company (Georgia Power), had installed and/or maintained the presence of protective grounds in its utility substation, located upstream of Building 79, thus exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $20479.5
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.147 F02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2021
Abate by
Oct 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:   a) In The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Co. Building 79, Albany, Georgia: On or about March 24, 2021, and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure the host employer's lockout tagout program was sufficient to protect its employees, thus exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.269 C04 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2021
Abate by
Oct 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $20,480
29 C.F.R. � 1910.269(c)(4)(i): The job briefing was not satisfactory and the employer did not ensure employees were cognizant of recognized hazards involved in the job.  a) In The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Co. Building 79, Albany, Georgia: On or about March 24, 2021, the employer did not conduct a joint briefing/discussion with site owner (Procter & Gamble) and the local electric distribution company (Georgia Power), which had a substation located upstream of Building 79. Employees were not briefed before commencing work and when returning from a break to ensure that employees' verification of isolation and de-energization of the switchgear equipment to be worked on had been accomplished and/or maintained by Georgia Power and/or Procter & Gamble, thus exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $20479.5
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.335 A01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2021
Abate by
Oct 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
29 C.F.R. � 1910.335(a)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards were provided with, and used, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.  In The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Co. Building 79, Albany, Georgia: On or about March 24, 2021, prior to beginning preventive maintenance work, the employer did not ensure employees utilized the appropriate personal protective equipment while performing duplicative verification testing on hazardous energy sources, of approximately 13,000 volts, thereby exposing employees to potential electrical shock and arc flash hazards during verification.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

View Eaton Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345239610.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.