OSHA Inspection: MARCELINO CARRILLO TRINIDAD

Issued

May 28, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.   a)  At 1805 Banyan Place, Lot 6G Bentley Oaks Estates, Cantonment, Florida:  On or about May 3, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing roofing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

May 28, 2021

Abate by

Jun 10, 2021

Penalty

Initial $3,511 · Current $3,511

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a)  At 1805 Banyan Place, Lot 6G Bentley Oaks Estates, Cantonment, Florida:  On or about May 3, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform roofing activities without using fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 11 feet 2 inches to the ground below.

Issued

May 28, 2021

Abate by

Jun 10, 2021

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   a)  At 1805 Banyan Place, Lot 6G Bentley Oaks Estates, Cantonment, Florida:  On or about May 3, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform roofing activities without first ensuring his employee was trained on the hazards associated with falls to include setting up and inspecting  fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 11 feet 2 inches to the ground below.

Issued

May 28, 2021

Abate by

Jun 10, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a)  At 1805 Banyan Place, Lot 6G Bentley Oaks Estates, Cantonment, Florida:  On or about May 3, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rails of the ladder did not extend at least three feet above the roof landing to provide safe access exposing his employee to a fall hazard of up to 11 feet 2 inches to the ground below.