Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRAYEX CORPORATION INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CRAYEX CORPORATION INC in 1747 COMMERCE DR., PIQUA, OH 45356 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 345327753.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Crayex Corporation INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Crayex Corporation INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1747 COMMERCE DR.
City
PIQUA
State
OH
ZIP
45356
Mailing
1747 COMMERCE DRIVE, PIQUA, OH 45356
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 1, 2021
Abate by
Jan 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,516 · Current $6,758 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips, and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  a) On or about May 20, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the Gamma portable winding machine exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points created by the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front and back sides of the machine  b) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the winding machine line 13 exposing employees to a caught by hazards from ingoing nip points created by rollers feeding plastic film on the front of the machine and from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the back and sides of the machine.  c) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the SANO winding unit number 5, exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front and back and sides of the machine.  d) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the SANO winding unit number 6, exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front and back and sides of the machine.  e) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the SANO winding unit number 7, exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front and back and sides of the machine.  f) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the SANO winding unit number 8, exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front and back and sides of the machine.  g) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the B-3 Bell-Mark Inline Printer exposing employees to a caught by hazards from ingoing nip points created on top of the machine by the printing drum and the frame.   h) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the B-4 Bell-Mark Inline Printer exposing employees to a caught by hazards from ingoing nip points created by rollers on top of the machine feeding plastic film.   i) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the Battenfeld Gloucester winding machine 144 on line 11, exposing employees to pinch points on the front of the machine during indexing and,  caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front back and sides of the machine.  j) On or about May 24, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the winding machine 192 D on line 10, exposing employees to a caught by hazard created from ingoing nip points of the plastic film being rolled onto spindles and the rotational hazard of the unused portions of the spindles on the front side of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6758
  • — Z (S) $13516

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 1, 2021
Abate by
Oct 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,516 · Current $6,758 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence:  (1)... (2)	Machine or equipment shutdown. The machine or equipment shall be turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment. An orderly shutdown must be utilized to avoid any additional or increased hazard(s) to employees as a result of the equipment stoppage. (3)	Machine or equipment isolation. All energy isolating devices that are needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment shall be physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s). (4)(ii) Lockout or tagout device application. Lockout devices, where used, shall be affixed in a manner to that will hold the energy isolating devices in a "safe" or "off" position  (5)(i) Stored energy. Following the application of lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices, all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy shall be relieved, disconnected, restrained, and otherwise rendered safe.  a) On or about May 24, 2021, employees were performing setup, on and around the SANO winding unit number 5 powered by electrical and pneumatic energy. The employer did not ensure sequences (2) through (5) were followed to ensure that employees were not exposed to rotating and moving parts during the "threading" of the winding machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6758
  • — Z (S) $13516

View Crayex Corporation INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345327753.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.